Scientific Articles’ Theoretical, Practical, Methodological, and Didactic Contributions



Main Article Content

Marcelo de Souza Bispo
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5817-8907 orcid

Abstract

The issue of how to use scientific articles to contribute to a field of knowledge and the possible types of contributions is crucial and needs further discussion. I am writing this piece with two objectives. The first one is to introduce a classification of the types of contributions (theoretical, practical, methodological, and didactic) from scientific research published in the form of scientific articles. The second is to present the articles’ format for each type of contribution, using RAC’s typology as a reference. In the final considerations, I point out that most articles rejected at desk review (even some good ones) is due to lack of adequacy to the journal’s expectations regarding contribution to the field, the format of the article, focus, and scope.



Downloads

Download data is not yet available.


Article Details

How to Cite
Bispo, M. de S. (2022). Scientific Articles’ Theoretical, Practical, Methodological, and Didactic Contributions. Journal of Contemporary Administration, 27(1), e220256. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-7849rac2023220256.en
Section
Editorial

References

Aitchison, C., & Lee, A. (2006). Research writing: Problems and pedagogies. Teaching in Higher Education, 11(3), 265-278. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562510600680574
Alberton, A., & Silva, A. B. da. (2018). How to write a good teaching case? Reflections on the method. Revista de Administração Contemporânea, 22(5), 745-761. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-7849rac2018180212
Bergh, D. (2003). From the editors: Thinking strategically about contribution. Academy of Management Journal, 46(2), 135-136. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2003.17481820
Bispo, M. de S. (2021). Ensaiando sobre o velho e falso dilema entre teoria e prática. Teoria e Prática em Administração, 11(2), 174-178. https://doi.org/10.22478/ufpb.2238-104X.2021v11n2.59760
Bispo, M. de S. (2022). In defense of theory and original theoretical contributions in administration. Revista de Administração Contemporânea, 26(6), e220158. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-7849rac2022220158.en
Cunliffe, A. L. (2022). Must I grow a pair of balls to theorize about theory in organization and management studies? Organization Theory, 3(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/26317877221109277
Faria, J. H. de. (2023). It has gone and no one knows if it will return: The progressive disappearance of the original theory. Revista de Administração Contemporânea, 27(1), e220065. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-7849rac2022220065.en
Gilmore, S., Harding, N., Helin, J., & Pullen, A. (2019). Writing differently. Management Learning, 50(1), 3–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350507618811027
Meneghetti, F. K. (2011). O que é um ensaio-teórico?. Revista de Administração Contemporânea, 15(2), 320-332. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1415-65552011000200010
Motta, G. da S. (2022). What is a technological article?. Revista de Administração Contemporânea, 26(Sup. 1), e220208. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-7849rac2022220208.en
Rynes, S. (2002). From the editors. Academy of Management Journal, 45(2), 311-313. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2002.17571225
Sandberg, J., & Alvesson, M. (2021). Meanings of theory: Clarifying theory through typification. Journal of Management Studies, 58(2), 487-516. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12587
Shepherd, D. A., & Suddaby, R. (2017). Theory building: A review and integration. Journal of Management, 43(1), 59–86. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316647102
Swedberg, R. (2014). Theorizing in social science: The context of discovery. Stanford University Press.
Walker, G. E., Golde, C. M., Jones, L., Bueschel, A. C., & Hutchings, P. (2008). The formation of scholars: Rethinking doctoral education for the Twenty-First Century. Jossey-Bass.