Communities and Social Technologies in the Development of Sustainable Business Models in the Amazon — Da Tribu’s Case
Main Article Content
Abstract
Objective: the bioeconomy has been repeatedly highlighted as the main path to sustainable development for the Amazon. However, the advancement of this movement faces numerous challenges, such as the creation of sustainable business models (SBMs) and the change of perspectives regarding old social technologies (STs) and local communities, which are sometimes seen as mere suppliers of raw materials. In order to better understand these challenges, this article aims to identify the role of the community and its social technologies in the design of an SBM. Theoretical approach: based on a single case study of Da Tribu, a biojewelry company located in the state of Pará, in the Brazilian Amazon, we demonstrate the recursive nature of the relationship: ST-communities- SBM. Method: through various primary and secondary data sources (interviews, non-participant observation, and online materials), we demonstrate the relevance of considering social technologies and other particular aspects of Amazonian communities in the design of a business. Results: conceptually, the research contributes to the discussion that brings ST and SBM closer together; the contribution to practice is based on essential points of attention for the creation and management of companies involved in the development of the Amazonian bioeconomy. With regard to communities, the study seeks to highlight voices that have been historically silenced and treated only as resources to be exploited. Conclusions: finally, the discussion highlights points that can also be considered in public policies aimed at the context under discussion.
Download data is not yet available.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Since mid-February of 2023, the authors retain the copyright relating to their article and grant the journal RAC, from ANPAD, the right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (CC BY 4.0), as stated in the article’s PDF document. This license provides that the article published can be shared (allows you to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format) and adapted (allows you to remix, transform, and create from the material for any purpose, even commercial) by anyone.
After article acceptance, the authors must sign a Term of Authorization for Publication, which is sent to the authors by e-mail for electronic signature before publication.
References
Andersen, J., Delica, K., & Fradsen, M. (2013). From “book Container” to community centre. In F. Moulaert, D. MacCallum, A. Mehmood, & A. Hamdouch (Eds.), The international handbook on social innovation: collective action, social learning and transdisciplinary research (pp. 197-206). Edward Elgar.
Aragón, L.E. (2018). A dimensão internacional da Amazônia: Um aporte para sua interpretação. Revista NERA, 21(42), 15- 33. https://doi.org/10.47946/rnera.v0i42.5676
Bocken, N. M. P., Short, S. W., Rana, P., & Evans, S. (2014). A literature and practice review to develop sustainable business model archetypes. Journal of Cleaner Production, 65, 42-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.11.039
Bocken, N. M. P., Rana, P., & Short, S. W. (2015). Value mapping for sustainable business thinking. Journal of Industrial and Production Engineering, 32(1), 67-81. http://doi.org/10.1080/21681015.2014.1000399
Castro, E. (2010). Políticas de estado e atores sociais na Amazônia contemporânea. In W. Bolle, E.
Castro, & M. Vejmelka (Orgs.). (2010) Amazônia: Região universal e teatro do mundo. Globo.
Creswell, J. W. (2021). Projeto de pesquisa: métodos qualitativo, quantitativo e misto. Penso Editora.
Creswell, J. W. (2013). Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications.
Dagnino, R. (Org). (2009). Tecnologia social: Ferramenta para construir outra sociedade. Komedi.
Dagnino, R. (2014). A tecnologia social e seus desafios. In Tecnologia social: Contribuições conceituais e metodológicas (pp.19-34). Editora Insular.
Duque, T. O., & Valadão, J. A. D. (2017). Abordagens teóricas de tecnologia social no Brasil. Revista Pensamento Contemporâneo em Administração, 11(5), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.12712/rpca.v11i5.962
Fernandes, J. A. L., Comini, G. M., & Rodrigues, J. (2022). Bioeconomia Inclusiva na Amazônia: como orquestrar a economia da floresta em pé. Stanford Social Innovation Review Brasil, 1(2), 24-31. https://bioeconomia.fea.usp. br/bioeconomia-inclusiva-na-amazonia-como-orquestrar-aeconomia- da-floresta-em-pe/
Feenberg, A. (2002). Transforming Technology. Oxford University Press.
Freudenreich, B., Lüdeke-Freund, F., & Schaltegger, S. (2020). A stakeholder theory perspective on business models: Value creation for sustainability. Journal of Business Ethics, 166, 3–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04112-z
Geissdoerfer, M, Savaget, P., Bocken, N., & Hultink, E. J. (2017). The circular economy – A new sustainability paradigm? Journal of Cleaner Production, 143, 757-768. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.048
Haussman, R. (2024). The Bioeconomy Will Not Save the Amazon. Project Syndicate. https://www.project-syndicate.org/ commentary/urban-development-holds-key-to-preservingamazon- rainforest-by-ricardo-hausmann-2024-04
Herrera, A. (1983). Transferencia de tecnología y tecnologías apropiadas: contribución a una visión prospectiva a largo plazo. Editora da Unicamp.
Hyde, K. F. (2000). Recognising deductive processes in qualitative research. Qualitative market research: An International Journal, 3(2), 82-90. https://doi.org/10.1108/13522750010322089
Jecquier, N. (1976). Appropriate technology: problems and promises. OECD Publications.
Kohr, L. (1981). Tecnología adecuada. In R. D. Laind, A. Lovins, I. Illich, J. Michell, F. Capra, & E. Bono (Eds.), Para Schumacher (pp. 207-216). H. Blume Ediciones, Madrid.
Krenak, A. (2019). Ideias para adiar o fim do mundo. Companhia das Letras.
Lovejoy, T., & Nobre, C. (2018). Amazon tipping point. Science Advances, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aat2340
Lüdeke-Freund, F. (2010). Towards a conceptual framework of ‘business models for sustainability’. In R. Wever, J. Quist, A. Tukker, J. Woudstra, F. Boons, & N. Beute (Eds.), Knowledge collaboration & learning for sustainable innovation (pp. 25-29). Delft.
Lüdeke-Freund, F., Carroux, S., Joyce, A., Massa, L., & Breuer, H. (2018). The Sustainable Business Model Pattern Taxonomy – 45 Patterns to Support Sustainability-Oriented Business Model Innovation. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 15, 145-162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2018.06.004
Neder, R. T., & Thomas, H. (2010). The movement for social technology in Latin-America. http://bit.ly/2V4PjjV
Nobre, C., Feltran-Barbieri, R., Costa, F. A., Haddad, E. A., Schaeffer, R., Domingues, E. P., Frasson, C. M. R., Camuri, P., Genin, C., Szklo, A., Lucena, A. F. P., Fernandes, D. A., Silva, H., Ventura, R., Folhes, R. T., Fiorini, A. C. O., Rocha, A. M., Santos, A. J. L., Klautau, Jr., A. B. Rocha; Magalhães, A. S., ... Barbosa, V. (2023). Nova Economia da Amazônia. Relatório. WRI Brasil. https://www.wribrasil.org.br/sites/default/files/2023-06/Nova_Economia_da_Amazonia- Relatorio_Completo-Portugues-2023.pdf
Olusola-Christwealth, D., & Kiaušienė, I. (2023). The development of sustainable business models: Concept, elements and importance. Vilnius University Proceedings, 37, 75-81. http://doi.org/10.15388/VGISC.2023.11
Osterwalder, A., & Pigneur, Y. (2002). An eBusiness model ontology for modeling eBusiness. In 2nd BLED Proceedings. http://aisel.aisnet.org/bled2002/2
Osterwalder, A., Pigneur, Y., & Tucci, C. L. (2005). Clarifying business models: Origins, present, and future of the concept. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 16(1), 1. http://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.01601
Pozzebon, M., & Fontenelle, I. A. (2018). Fostering the postdevelopment debate: the Latin American concept of tecnologia social. Third World Quarterly, 39(9), 1750- 1769. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2018.1432351
Richardson, J. E. (2005). The business model: An integrative framework for strategy execution. SSRN Product & Service. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.932998
Richardson, R. J. (1999). Pesquisa social: métodos e técnicas. Atlas.
Schaltegger, S., Lüdeke-Freund, F., & Hansen, E. (2016). Business models for sustainability: A co-evolutionary analysis of sustainable entrepreneurship, innovation, and transformation. Organization & Environment, 29(3), 264- 289. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026616633272
Souza, A. C. A. A. D., & Pozzebon, M. (2020). Práticas e mecanismos de uma tecnologia social: proposição de um modelo a partir de uma experiência no semiárido. Organizações & Sociedade, 27, 231-254. https://doi.org/10.1590/1984-9270934
Stake, R. E. (1998). Qualitative research: Studying how things work. The Guilford Press.
Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Sage.
Thomas, H. (2009). Tecnologías para la inclusión social y políticas públicas en América Latina. Tecnologias sociais: Caminhos para a sustentabilidade (pp. 25-81). https://mediaserver. almg.gov.br/acervo/34/603/2034603.pdf
Upward, A., & Jones, P. (2016). An ontology for strongly sustainable business models: Defining an enterprise framework compatible with natural and social science. Organization & Environment, 29(1), 97-123. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026615592933