The Impact of Payments for Environmental Services in the Atlantic Forest: A Geospatial Study
Open Data
Main Article Content
Ricardo Cerveira
Nágela Bianca do Prado
Gabriela Tonini
Christiano França da Cunha
Abstract
Objective: this study aimed at understanding the impact of payment for environmental services (PES) programs in relation to environmental indicators in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest biome. Theoretical approach: the literary framework included three topics of discussion: payment for environmental services, program evaluation, and theory of change. In a broader way, the theme of evaluating programs in the agricultural area was articulated, considering the precepts of the theory of change. Method: geospatial data on land use, between 2016 and 2021, and amounts paid under the PES program with rural producers were collected to evaluate the impact on the increase or decrease in degraded and recovered areas. Data analysis included multivariate statistics, more specifically the comparison between groups and the relationship between variables through multiple linear regression. Results: the empirical results highlight that there is a significant difference in the increase in areas under recovery between producers who received PES values and producers not participating in this program. As for the types of PES, the one that pays for improvements in land use contributed most to the increase in the area under recovery. Conclusions: the study shows that evaluation methods for PES must be increasingly complex and measurable, as there are several possibilities for impacts depending on the objective of the program. The results are relevant to the theoretical, practical, and social spheres, in addition to helping to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Download data is not yet available.
Article Details
How to Cite
Cerveira, R., Prado, N. B. do, Tonini, G., & Cunha, C. F. da. (2024). The Impact of Payments for Environmental Services in the Atlantic Forest: A Geospatial Study. Journal of Contemporary Administration, 28(3), e240020. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-7849rac2024240020.en
Section
Theoretical-empirical Articles
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Since mid-February of 2023, the authors retain the copyright relating to their article and grant the journal RAC, from ANPAD, the right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (CC BY 4.0), as stated in the article’s PDF document. This license provides that the article published can be shared (allows you to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format) and adapted (allows you to remix, transform, and create from the material for any purpose, even commercial) by anyone.
After article acceptance, the authors must sign a Term of Authorization for Publication, which is sent to the authors by e-mail for electronic signature before publication.
References
Araújo, L. M. D. (2019). Dimensão espacial na análise econômica de esquemas de pagamento por serviços ambientais: O caminho para a eficácia [Dissertação de Mestrado]. Universidade de Brasília.
Bauchet, J., Asquith, N., Ma, Z., Radel, C., Godoy, R., Zanotti, L., Steele, D., Gramig, B. M., & Chong, A. E. (2020). The practice of Payments for Ecosystem Services (PES) in the Tropical Andes: Evidence from program administrators. Ecosystem Services, 45, 101175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2020.101175
Bragança, A., Newton, P., Cohn, A., Assunção, J., Camboim, C., Faveri, D., Farinelli, B., Perego, V. M. E., Tavares, M., Resende, J., Medeiros, S., & Searchinger, T. D. (2022). Extension services can promote pasture restoration: Evidence from Brazil’s low carbon agriculture plan. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 119(12). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2114913119
Costa, F. L., & Castanhar, J. C. (2003). Avaliação de programas públicos: desafios conceituais e metodológicos. Revista de Administração Pública, 37(5). https://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/6509
Costedoat, S., Corbera, E., Ezzine-de-Blas, D., Honey- Rosés, J., Baylis, K., & Castillo-Santiago, M. A. (2015). How effective are biodiversity conservation payments in Mexico? PLOS ONE, 10(3), e0119881. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0119881
Cotta, T. C. (2014). Metodologias de avaliação de programas e projetos sociais: Análise de resultados e de impacto. Revista Do Serviço Público, 49(2), 103–124. https://doi.org/10.21874/rsp.v49i2.368
Escola Nacional de Administração Pública. (2022). Avaliação de Impacto de Programas e Políticas Sociais. https://www.escolavirtual.gov.br/curso/98
Engel, S. (2016). The devil in the detail: A practical guide on designing payments for environmental services. International Review of Environmental and Resource Economics, 9(1–2), 131– 177. https://doi.org/10.1561/101.00000076
Eshoo, P. F., Johnson, A., Duangdala, S., & Hansel, T. (2018). Design, monitoring and evaluation of a direct payments approach for an ecotourism strategy to reduce illegal hunting and trade of wildlife in Lao PDR. PLOS ONE, 13(2), e0186133. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0186133
Ezzine-de-Blas, D., Wunder, S., Ruiz-Pérez, M., & Moreno-Sanchez, R. del P. (2016). Global Patterns in the Implementation of Payments for Environmental Services. PLOS ONE, 11(3), e0149847. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0149847
Ferreira M., S., Barcelos, C. P. D., Gomes, J. B. M., Souza Sobrinho, N. C. S., & Maciel, C. P. (2021). Captura de CO2 e Pagamento por Serviços Ambientais e Educação Ambiental: breve análise dos projetos “Olhos d’Água” e Conexão Mata Atlântica no Norte e Noroeste Fluminense. Educação Ambiental (Brasil), 2(1), 61–77. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4744117
Finkler, L., & Dellaglio, D. D. (2013). Reflexões sobre avaliação de programas e projetos sociais. Barbarói, 38. http://pepsic.bvsalud.org/scielo.php?script=sci_ arttext&pid=S0104-65782013000100008
Formigoni, M. H., Xavier, A. C., & Lima, J. S. D. S. (2011). Análise temporal da vegetação na região do nordeste através de dados EVI do MODIS. Ciência Florestal, 21(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.5902/198050982740
Fox J., & Weisberg, S. (2020). An R Companion to Applied Regression. Sage Publications. Fundação de Empreendimentos Científicos e Tecnológicos. (2022). Casos de sucesso. https://www.finatec.org.br/projeto/ projeto-conexao-mata-atlantica/
Game, E. T., Bremer L. L., Calvache, A., Moreno, P. H., Vargas, A., Rivera, B., & Rodriguez, L. M. (2018). Fuzzy models to inform social and environmental indicator selection for conservation impact monitoring. Conservation Letters, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12338
Gil, A. C. (2010). Como elaborar projetos de pesquisa (5ª ed). Atlas. Haces-Fernandez, F. (2022). Assessment of the financial benefits from wind farms in us rural locations. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 15(10), 423. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm15100423
Hair, J., Jr., F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Sant’Anna, M. A. G. A. S. (2009). Análise Multivariada de Dados (6th ed.). Bookman.
Hajjar, R., Newton, P., Ihalainen, M., Agrawal, A., Alix-Garcia, J., Castle, S. E., Erbaugh, J. T., Gabay, M., Hughes, K., Mawutor, S., Pacheco, P., Schoneveld, G., & Timko, J. A. (2021). Levers for alleviating poverty in forests. Forest Policy and Economics, 132, 102589. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2021.102589
Hanley, N. (2014). Incentivizing the provision of ecosystem services. International Review of Environmental and Resource Economics, 7(3–4), 299–331. https://doi.org/10.1561/101.00000064
Hasenack, H., Cordeiro, J. L. P., & Weber, E. J. (2015). Uso e cobertura vegetal do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul – situação em 2002 (1st ed.). UFRGS IB Centro de Ecologia. http://www.ecologia.ufrgs.br/labgeo
Jack, B. K., & Jayachandran, S. (2019). Self-selection into payments for ecosystem services programs. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(12), 5326–5333. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1802868115
Kleiman, D. G., Reading, R. P., Miller, B. J., Clark, T. W., Michael, J., Robinson, J., Wallace, R. L., Cabin, R. J., Felleman, F., Clark, T. I. M. W., Scott, J. M., Robinson, J., Wallace, R. L., Cabin, R., & Fellemantt, F. (2016). Society for conservation Biology improving the evaluation of conservation programs linked references are available on jstor for this article. Improving the Evaluation of Conservation Programs. 14(2), 356–365. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2641601
Lankford, B. A., Makin, I., Matthews, N., Noble, A., McCornick, P. G., & Shah, T. (2016). A compact to revitalise largescale irrigation systems using a leadership-partnershipownership “theory of change.” Water Alternatives, 9(1), 1–32. https://www.water-alternatives.org/index.php/ alldoc/articles/302-a9-1-1/file
Lapeyre, R., Pirard, R., & Leimona, B. (2015). Payments for environmental services in Indonesia: What if economic signals were lost in translation? Land Use Policy, 46, 283– 291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.03.004
Lapola, D. M., Oyama, M. D., Nobre, C. A., & Sampaio, G. (2008). A new world natural vegetation map for global change studies. Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências, 80(2), 397–408. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0001-37652008000200017
Larson, S., Stoeckl, N., Jarvis, D., Addison, J., Prior, S., & Esparon, M. (2019). Using measures of wellbeing for impact evaluation: Proof of concept developed with an Indigenous community undertaking land management programs in northern Australia. Ambio, 48(1), 89–98. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-018-1058-3
Le Velly, G., & Dutilly, C. (2016). Evaluating payments for environmental services: Methodological challenges. PLOS ONE, 11(2), e0149374. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0149374
Low-Décarie, E., Chivers, C., & Granados, M. (2014). Rising complexity and falling explanatory power in ecology. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 12(7), 412–418. https://doi.org/10.1890/130230
Martin-Ortega, J., Ojea, E., & Roux, C. (2013). Payments for water ecosystem services in Latin America: A literature review and conceptual model. Ecosystem Services, 6, 122–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.09.008
Martin-Ortega, J., Skuras, D., Perni, A., Holen, S., & Psaltopoulos, D. (2014). Chapter 10: The disproportionality principle in the WFD: how to actually apply it? (pp. 214–249). In T. Bournaris, J. Berbel, B. Manos, & D. Viaggi (Eds.), Economics of water management in agriculture. Ministério da Ciência, Tecnologia e Inovação. (2022). Conexão Mata Atlântica. https://conexaomataatlantica.mctic.gov.br/cma/portal/
Morellato, L. P. C., & Haddad, C. F. B. (2000). Introduction: The Brazilian Atlantic Forest 1. Biotropica, 32(4b), 786–792. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7429.2000.tb00618.x
Organização para a Cooperação e Desenvolvimento Econômico. (2018). OECD Environmental Outlook to 2050: The Consequences of Inaction. https://www.oecd.org/g20/topics/energy-environment-green-growth/nvironmentaloutlookto2050theconsequencesofinaction.htm Pascual, U., Muradian, R., Rodríguez, L. C., & Duraiappah, A. (2010). Exploring the links between equity and efficiency in payments for environmental services: A conceptual approach. Ecological Economics, 69(6), 1237–1244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.11.004
Pereira, C. S. S., & Alves Sobrinho, T. (2017). World stage of Payments for Environmental Services (PES) for water conservation. Ambiência, 13(2). https://doi.org/10.5935/ambiencia.2017.02.17rb
Projeto MapBiomas. (2023). Coleção 7 da Série Anual de Mapas de Uso e Cobertura da Terra do Brasil. https://brasil.mapbiomas.org/map/colecao-7/
Roberts, D. A., Cuadros, D., Vandormael, A., Gareta, D., Barnabas, R. V, Herbst, K., Tanser, F., & Akullian, A. (2022). Predicting the risk of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) acquisition in rural South Africa using Geospatial Data. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 75(7), 1224–1231. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciac069
Rodrigues, P., Sugahara, C. R., Branchi, B. A., & Ferreira, D. H. L. (2021). Teoria da mudança e metodologias de avaliação de projetos sociais nas organizações. Revista de Empreendedorismo, Negócios e Inovação, 6(1), 55–74. https://doi.org/10.36942/reni.v6i1.332
Rosa, M. R. (2016). Comparação e análise de diferentes metodologias de mapeamento da cobertura florestal da mata atlântica. Boletim Paulista de Geografia, 95, 25–34. https://publicacoes.agb.org.br/boletim-paulista/article/view/658
Ruggiero, P. G. C., Metzger, J. P., Tambosi, L. R., & Nichols, E. (2019). Payment for ecosystem services programs in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest: Effective but not enough. Land Use Policy, 82, 283–291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.11.054
Saccol, A. Z., Pedron, C. D., Liberali, G., Macadar, M. A., & Cazella, S. C. (2004). Avaliação do impacto dos sistemas ERP sobre variáveis estratégicas de grandes empresas no Brasil. Revista de Administração Contemporânea, 8(1), 9–34. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1415-65552004000100002
Santos, E. P., Lima, F. G. S. F., Notaor, C. V. R., Lima, M. T. A., & Bologna, A. C. F. M. B. (2022). Painel de indicadores de mobilidade: Uma aplicação prática da teoria da mudança no grande Recife. 46º Encontro da Associação Nacional de Pós- Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração. ANPAD.
Santos, J. S., Leite, C. C. C., Viana, J. C. C., Santos, A. R., Fernandes, M. M., Abreu, V. de S., Nascimento, T. P., Santos, L. S., Fernandes, M. R. de M., Silva, G. F., & Mendonça, A. R. (2018). Delimitation of ecological corridors in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest. Ecological Indicators, 88, 414–424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.01.011
Sills, E., Pattanayak, S. K., & Ferraro, P. (2006). Abordagens analíticas na avaliação de impactos reais de programas de conservação. Mega Diversidade, 2(1-2). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/255643442_Abordagens_analiticas_na_avaliacao_de_impactos_reais_de_programas_de_conservacao
Souza, C. M., Z. Shimbo, J., Rosa, M. R., Parente, L. L., A. Alencar, A., Rudorff, B. F. T., Hasenack, H., Matsumoto, M., G. Ferreira, L., Souza-Filho, P. W. M., Oliveira, S. W., Rocha, W. F., Fonseca, A. V., Marques, C. B., Diniz, C. G., Costa, D., Monteiro, D., Rosa, E. R., Vélez-Martin, E., … Azevedo, T. (2020). Reconstructing three decades of land use and land cover changes in brazilian biomes with landsat archive and earth engine. Remote Sensing, 12(17), 2735. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12172735
Sugahara, C. R., & Rodrigues, P. P. (2019). Avaliação de impacto de negócios sociais e teoria da mudança. Revista Nacional de Gerenciamento de Cidades, 7(46). https://doi.org/10.17271/2318847274620192080
Tacconi, L. (2012). Redefining payments for environmental services. Ecological Economics, 73, 29–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.09.028
Tengberg, A., & Valencia, S. (2018). Integrated approaches to natural resources management—Theory and practice. Land Degradation & Development, 29(6), 1845–1857. https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.2946
Uhl, J. H., & Leyk, S. (2022). A scale-sensitive framework for the spatially explicit accuracy assessment of binary built-up surface layers. Remote Sensing of Environment, 279, 113117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2022.113117
Wegner, G. I. (2016). Payments for ecosystem services (PES): A flexible, participatory, and integrated approach for improved conservation and equity outcomes. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 18(3), 617–644. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-015-9673-7
Wiik, E., Jones, J. P. G., Pynegar, E., Bottazzi, P., Asquith, N., Gibbons, J., & Kontoleon, A. (2020). Mechanisms and impacts of an incentive‐based conservation program with evidence from a randomized control trial. Conservation Biology, 34(5), 1076– 1088. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13508
WRI Brasil. (2021). Como funciona o pagamento por serviços ambientais a quem protege e restaura florestas. https://wribrasil.org.br/pt/blog/florestas/como-funciona-o-pagamento-por-servicosambientais-quem-protege-e-restaura-florestas#:~:text=O primeiro ano da Década, no Congresso Nacional desde 2007
Wunder, S. (2007). The efficiency of payments for environmental services in tropical conservation. Conservation Biology, 21(1), 48–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00559.x
Wunder, S., Börner, J., Ezzine-de-Blas, D., Feder S., & Pagiola, S. (2020). Payments for environmental services: Past performance and pending potentials. Annual Review of Resource Economics, 12(1), 209–234. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-resource-100518-094206
Yablonovitch, E., & Deckman, H. W. (2023). Scalable, economical, and stable sequestration of agricultural fixed carbon. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 120(16). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2217695120
Bauchet, J., Asquith, N., Ma, Z., Radel, C., Godoy, R., Zanotti, L., Steele, D., Gramig, B. M., & Chong, A. E. (2020). The practice of Payments for Ecosystem Services (PES) in the Tropical Andes: Evidence from program administrators. Ecosystem Services, 45, 101175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2020.101175
Bragança, A., Newton, P., Cohn, A., Assunção, J., Camboim, C., Faveri, D., Farinelli, B., Perego, V. M. E., Tavares, M., Resende, J., Medeiros, S., & Searchinger, T. D. (2022). Extension services can promote pasture restoration: Evidence from Brazil’s low carbon agriculture plan. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 119(12). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2114913119
Costa, F. L., & Castanhar, J. C. (2003). Avaliação de programas públicos: desafios conceituais e metodológicos. Revista de Administração Pública, 37(5). https://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/6509
Costedoat, S., Corbera, E., Ezzine-de-Blas, D., Honey- Rosés, J., Baylis, K., & Castillo-Santiago, M. A. (2015). How effective are biodiversity conservation payments in Mexico? PLOS ONE, 10(3), e0119881. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0119881
Cotta, T. C. (2014). Metodologias de avaliação de programas e projetos sociais: Análise de resultados e de impacto. Revista Do Serviço Público, 49(2), 103–124. https://doi.org/10.21874/rsp.v49i2.368
Escola Nacional de Administração Pública. (2022). Avaliação de Impacto de Programas e Políticas Sociais. https://www.escolavirtual.gov.br/curso/98
Engel, S. (2016). The devil in the detail: A practical guide on designing payments for environmental services. International Review of Environmental and Resource Economics, 9(1–2), 131– 177. https://doi.org/10.1561/101.00000076
Eshoo, P. F., Johnson, A., Duangdala, S., & Hansel, T. (2018). Design, monitoring and evaluation of a direct payments approach for an ecotourism strategy to reduce illegal hunting and trade of wildlife in Lao PDR. PLOS ONE, 13(2), e0186133. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0186133
Ezzine-de-Blas, D., Wunder, S., Ruiz-Pérez, M., & Moreno-Sanchez, R. del P. (2016). Global Patterns in the Implementation of Payments for Environmental Services. PLOS ONE, 11(3), e0149847. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0149847
Ferreira M., S., Barcelos, C. P. D., Gomes, J. B. M., Souza Sobrinho, N. C. S., & Maciel, C. P. (2021). Captura de CO2 e Pagamento por Serviços Ambientais e Educação Ambiental: breve análise dos projetos “Olhos d’Água” e Conexão Mata Atlântica no Norte e Noroeste Fluminense. Educação Ambiental (Brasil), 2(1), 61–77. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4744117
Finkler, L., & Dellaglio, D. D. (2013). Reflexões sobre avaliação de programas e projetos sociais. Barbarói, 38. http://pepsic.bvsalud.org/scielo.php?script=sci_ arttext&pid=S0104-65782013000100008
Formigoni, M. H., Xavier, A. C., & Lima, J. S. D. S. (2011). Análise temporal da vegetação na região do nordeste através de dados EVI do MODIS. Ciência Florestal, 21(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.5902/198050982740
Fox J., & Weisberg, S. (2020). An R Companion to Applied Regression. Sage Publications. Fundação de Empreendimentos Científicos e Tecnológicos. (2022). Casos de sucesso. https://www.finatec.org.br/projeto/ projeto-conexao-mata-atlantica/
Game, E. T., Bremer L. L., Calvache, A., Moreno, P. H., Vargas, A., Rivera, B., & Rodriguez, L. M. (2018). Fuzzy models to inform social and environmental indicator selection for conservation impact monitoring. Conservation Letters, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12338
Gil, A. C. (2010). Como elaborar projetos de pesquisa (5ª ed). Atlas. Haces-Fernandez, F. (2022). Assessment of the financial benefits from wind farms in us rural locations. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 15(10), 423. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm15100423
Hair, J., Jr., F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Sant’Anna, M. A. G. A. S. (2009). Análise Multivariada de Dados (6th ed.). Bookman.
Hajjar, R., Newton, P., Ihalainen, M., Agrawal, A., Alix-Garcia, J., Castle, S. E., Erbaugh, J. T., Gabay, M., Hughes, K., Mawutor, S., Pacheco, P., Schoneveld, G., & Timko, J. A. (2021). Levers for alleviating poverty in forests. Forest Policy and Economics, 132, 102589. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2021.102589
Hanley, N. (2014). Incentivizing the provision of ecosystem services. International Review of Environmental and Resource Economics, 7(3–4), 299–331. https://doi.org/10.1561/101.00000064
Hasenack, H., Cordeiro, J. L. P., & Weber, E. J. (2015). Uso e cobertura vegetal do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul – situação em 2002 (1st ed.). UFRGS IB Centro de Ecologia. http://www.ecologia.ufrgs.br/labgeo
Jack, B. K., & Jayachandran, S. (2019). Self-selection into payments for ecosystem services programs. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(12), 5326–5333. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1802868115
Kleiman, D. G., Reading, R. P., Miller, B. J., Clark, T. W., Michael, J., Robinson, J., Wallace, R. L., Cabin, R. J., Felleman, F., Clark, T. I. M. W., Scott, J. M., Robinson, J., Wallace, R. L., Cabin, R., & Fellemantt, F. (2016). Society for conservation Biology improving the evaluation of conservation programs linked references are available on jstor for this article. Improving the Evaluation of Conservation Programs. 14(2), 356–365. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2641601
Lankford, B. A., Makin, I., Matthews, N., Noble, A., McCornick, P. G., & Shah, T. (2016). A compact to revitalise largescale irrigation systems using a leadership-partnershipownership “theory of change.” Water Alternatives, 9(1), 1–32. https://www.water-alternatives.org/index.php/ alldoc/articles/302-a9-1-1/file
Lapeyre, R., Pirard, R., & Leimona, B. (2015). Payments for environmental services in Indonesia: What if economic signals were lost in translation? Land Use Policy, 46, 283– 291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.03.004
Lapola, D. M., Oyama, M. D., Nobre, C. A., & Sampaio, G. (2008). A new world natural vegetation map for global change studies. Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências, 80(2), 397–408. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0001-37652008000200017
Larson, S., Stoeckl, N., Jarvis, D., Addison, J., Prior, S., & Esparon, M. (2019). Using measures of wellbeing for impact evaluation: Proof of concept developed with an Indigenous community undertaking land management programs in northern Australia. Ambio, 48(1), 89–98. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-018-1058-3
Le Velly, G., & Dutilly, C. (2016). Evaluating payments for environmental services: Methodological challenges. PLOS ONE, 11(2), e0149374. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0149374
Low-Décarie, E., Chivers, C., & Granados, M. (2014). Rising complexity and falling explanatory power in ecology. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 12(7), 412–418. https://doi.org/10.1890/130230
Martin-Ortega, J., Ojea, E., & Roux, C. (2013). Payments for water ecosystem services in Latin America: A literature review and conceptual model. Ecosystem Services, 6, 122–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.09.008
Martin-Ortega, J., Skuras, D., Perni, A., Holen, S., & Psaltopoulos, D. (2014). Chapter 10: The disproportionality principle in the WFD: how to actually apply it? (pp. 214–249). In T. Bournaris, J. Berbel, B. Manos, & D. Viaggi (Eds.), Economics of water management in agriculture. Ministério da Ciência, Tecnologia e Inovação. (2022). Conexão Mata Atlântica. https://conexaomataatlantica.mctic.gov.br/cma/portal/
Morellato, L. P. C., & Haddad, C. F. B. (2000). Introduction: The Brazilian Atlantic Forest 1. Biotropica, 32(4b), 786–792. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7429.2000.tb00618.x
Organização para a Cooperação e Desenvolvimento Econômico. (2018). OECD Environmental Outlook to 2050: The Consequences of Inaction. https://www.oecd.org/g20/topics/energy-environment-green-growth/nvironmentaloutlookto2050theconsequencesofinaction.htm Pascual, U., Muradian, R., Rodríguez, L. C., & Duraiappah, A. (2010). Exploring the links between equity and efficiency in payments for environmental services: A conceptual approach. Ecological Economics, 69(6), 1237–1244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.11.004
Pereira, C. S. S., & Alves Sobrinho, T. (2017). World stage of Payments for Environmental Services (PES) for water conservation. Ambiência, 13(2). https://doi.org/10.5935/ambiencia.2017.02.17rb
Projeto MapBiomas. (2023). Coleção 7 da Série Anual de Mapas de Uso e Cobertura da Terra do Brasil. https://brasil.mapbiomas.org/map/colecao-7/
Roberts, D. A., Cuadros, D., Vandormael, A., Gareta, D., Barnabas, R. V, Herbst, K., Tanser, F., & Akullian, A. (2022). Predicting the risk of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) acquisition in rural South Africa using Geospatial Data. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 75(7), 1224–1231. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciac069
Rodrigues, P., Sugahara, C. R., Branchi, B. A., & Ferreira, D. H. L. (2021). Teoria da mudança e metodologias de avaliação de projetos sociais nas organizações. Revista de Empreendedorismo, Negócios e Inovação, 6(1), 55–74. https://doi.org/10.36942/reni.v6i1.332
Rosa, M. R. (2016). Comparação e análise de diferentes metodologias de mapeamento da cobertura florestal da mata atlântica. Boletim Paulista de Geografia, 95, 25–34. https://publicacoes.agb.org.br/boletim-paulista/article/view/658
Ruggiero, P. G. C., Metzger, J. P., Tambosi, L. R., & Nichols, E. (2019). Payment for ecosystem services programs in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest: Effective but not enough. Land Use Policy, 82, 283–291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.11.054
Saccol, A. Z., Pedron, C. D., Liberali, G., Macadar, M. A., & Cazella, S. C. (2004). Avaliação do impacto dos sistemas ERP sobre variáveis estratégicas de grandes empresas no Brasil. Revista de Administração Contemporânea, 8(1), 9–34. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1415-65552004000100002
Santos, E. P., Lima, F. G. S. F., Notaor, C. V. R., Lima, M. T. A., & Bologna, A. C. F. M. B. (2022). Painel de indicadores de mobilidade: Uma aplicação prática da teoria da mudança no grande Recife. 46º Encontro da Associação Nacional de Pós- Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração. ANPAD.
Santos, J. S., Leite, C. C. C., Viana, J. C. C., Santos, A. R., Fernandes, M. M., Abreu, V. de S., Nascimento, T. P., Santos, L. S., Fernandes, M. R. de M., Silva, G. F., & Mendonça, A. R. (2018). Delimitation of ecological corridors in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest. Ecological Indicators, 88, 414–424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.01.011
Sills, E., Pattanayak, S. K., & Ferraro, P. (2006). Abordagens analíticas na avaliação de impactos reais de programas de conservação. Mega Diversidade, 2(1-2). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/255643442_Abordagens_analiticas_na_avaliacao_de_impactos_reais_de_programas_de_conservacao
Souza, C. M., Z. Shimbo, J., Rosa, M. R., Parente, L. L., A. Alencar, A., Rudorff, B. F. T., Hasenack, H., Matsumoto, M., G. Ferreira, L., Souza-Filho, P. W. M., Oliveira, S. W., Rocha, W. F., Fonseca, A. V., Marques, C. B., Diniz, C. G., Costa, D., Monteiro, D., Rosa, E. R., Vélez-Martin, E., … Azevedo, T. (2020). Reconstructing three decades of land use and land cover changes in brazilian biomes with landsat archive and earth engine. Remote Sensing, 12(17), 2735. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12172735
Sugahara, C. R., & Rodrigues, P. P. (2019). Avaliação de impacto de negócios sociais e teoria da mudança. Revista Nacional de Gerenciamento de Cidades, 7(46). https://doi.org/10.17271/2318847274620192080
Tacconi, L. (2012). Redefining payments for environmental services. Ecological Economics, 73, 29–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.09.028
Tengberg, A., & Valencia, S. (2018). Integrated approaches to natural resources management—Theory and practice. Land Degradation & Development, 29(6), 1845–1857. https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.2946
Uhl, J. H., & Leyk, S. (2022). A scale-sensitive framework for the spatially explicit accuracy assessment of binary built-up surface layers. Remote Sensing of Environment, 279, 113117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2022.113117
Wegner, G. I. (2016). Payments for ecosystem services (PES): A flexible, participatory, and integrated approach for improved conservation and equity outcomes. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 18(3), 617–644. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-015-9673-7
Wiik, E., Jones, J. P. G., Pynegar, E., Bottazzi, P., Asquith, N., Gibbons, J., & Kontoleon, A. (2020). Mechanisms and impacts of an incentive‐based conservation program with evidence from a randomized control trial. Conservation Biology, 34(5), 1076– 1088. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13508
WRI Brasil. (2021). Como funciona o pagamento por serviços ambientais a quem protege e restaura florestas. https://wribrasil.org.br/pt/blog/florestas/como-funciona-o-pagamento-por-servicosambientais-quem-protege-e-restaura-florestas#:~:text=O primeiro ano da Década, no Congresso Nacional desde 2007
Wunder, S. (2007). The efficiency of payments for environmental services in tropical conservation. Conservation Biology, 21(1), 48–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00559.x
Wunder, S., Börner, J., Ezzine-de-Blas, D., Feder S., & Pagiola, S. (2020). Payments for environmental services: Past performance and pending potentials. Annual Review of Resource Economics, 12(1), 209–234. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-resource-100518-094206
Yablonovitch, E., & Deckman, H. W. (2023). Scalable, economical, and stable sequestration of agricultural fixed carbon. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 120(16). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2217695120