Temporal Flow of Technology Transfer Capability: Beyond the Lifecycle



Main Article Content

Cleverton Rodrigues Fernandes
André Gustavo Carvalho Machado
Glauco Simões Gomes

Abstract

Objective: to analyze the behavior of technology transfer capability over time in Brazilian public institutions of higher education. Method: the extended case method was adopted in two national institutions of reference in technology transfer management. Interviews, observations, and document analysis were the main techniques for data collection. The analysis was performed using also the techniques of the extended case method. Results: became evident that the behavior of a capacity, during its existence, may not obey a linear curve, but vary over different stages and undergo different mutations. Conclusions: it was concluded that the lifecycle of a capability would not be exactly equivalent or limited to the heuristic of a biological lifecycle with predictable entropy until the total collapse. Unlike this, considering the environment and the conjuncture, a capability can come back to exist as long as it is understood as opportune and feasible. The findings advance the understanding of the technology transfer process that now has the explanatory potential of dynamic capabilities.



Downloads

Download data is not yet available.


Article Details

How to Cite
Fernandes, C. R., Machado, A. G. C., & Gomes, G. S. (2022). Temporal Flow of Technology Transfer Capability: Beyond the Lifecycle. Journal of Contemporary Administration, e210185. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-7849rac2022210185.en
Section
Theoretical-empirical Articles

References

Adner, R., & Helfat, C. E. (2003). Corporate effects and dynamics managerial capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 24(10), 1011-1025. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.331
Ahmad-Zaidi, M. F., & Othman, S. N. (2011). Exploring the concept of technology management through dynamic capability perspective. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 2(5), 41-54. Retrieved from http://ijbssnet.com/journal/index/226
Ahn, M. J., Zwikael, O., & Bednarek, R. (2010). Technological invention to product innovation: A project management approach. International Journal of Project Management, 28(6), 559-568. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2009.11.001
Almeida-Guerra, R. M., Tondolo, V. A. G., & Camargo, M. E. (2016). O que (ainda) podemos aprender sobre capacidades dinâmicas. Revista Ibero Americana de Estratégia, 15(1), 44-64. https://doi.org/10.5585/riae.v15i1.2168
Ambrosini, V., & Bowman, C. (2009). What are dynamics capabilities and are they a useful construct in strategic management? International Journal of Management Reviews, 11(1), 29-49. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2008.00251.x
Ambrosini, V., Bowman, C., & Collier, N. (2009). Dynamic capabilities: An exploration of how firms renew their resource base. British Journal of Management, 20(S1), S9-S24. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2008.00610.x
Aragón-Correa, J., & Sharma, S. (2003). A contingent resource-based view of proactive corporate environmental strategy. Academy of Management Review, 28(1), 71-88. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2003.8925233
Araújo, E. F., Barbosa, C. M., Queiroga, E. D. S., & Alves, F. F. (2010). Propriedade intelectual: Proteção e gestão estratégica do conhecimento. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, 39(suppl spe), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982010001300001
Arend, R. J. (2015). Mobius’ edge: Infinite regress in the resource-based and dynamic capabilities views. Strategic Organization, 13(1), 75-85. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127014563051
Baglieri, D., Baldi, F., & Tucci, C. L. (2018). University technology transfer office business models: One size does not fit all. Technovation, 76-77, 51-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2018.05.003
Barreto, I. (2010). Dynamic capabilities: A review of past research and an agenda for the future. Journal of Management, 36(1), 256-280. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206309350776
Bartlett, C. A., & Ghoshal, S. (2000). Going global: Lessons from late movers. Harvard Business Review, 78(2), 132-142. Retrieved from https://hbr.org/2000/03/going-global-lessons-from-late-movers
Basso Júnior, A. F., Persch, L. L., Kiekow, A., Seben, P. S., Gubert, F., & Tondolo, V. A. G. (2016). Triangulação: Uma ferramenta de validade e confiabilidade. SINERGIA-Revista do Instituto de Ciências Econômicas, Administrativas e Contábeis, 20(1), 19-28. Retrieved from https://periodicos.furg.br/sinergia/article/view/5441
Bejinaru, R. (2017). Dynamic capabilities of universities in the knowledge economy. Management Dynamics in the Knowledge Economy, 5(4), 577-595. Retrieved from https://www.managementdynamics.ro/index.php/journal/article/view/250
Bengtsson, L. (2017). A comparison of university technology transfer offices’ commercialization strategies in the Scandinavian countries. Science and Public Policy, 44(4), 565-577. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scw086
Bercovitz, J., & Feldmann, M. (2006). Entrepreneurial universities and technology transfer: A conceptual framework for understanding knowledge-based economic development. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 31(1), 175-188. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-005-5029-z
Berbegal-Mirabent, J., Gil-Doménech, D., & Torre, E. M. (2020). Examining strategies behind universities’ technology transfer portfolio: How different patterns of resource consumption can lead to similar technology transfer profiles. Competitiveness Review: An International Business Journal, 31(3), 571-593. https://doi.org/10.1108/CR-01-2020-0013
Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (2004). A construção social da realidade: Tratado de sociologia do conhecimento (24 ed.). Petrópolis, RJ: Vozes.
Blyler, M., & Coff, R. W. (2003). Dynamic capabilities, social, capital, and rent appropriation: Ties that split pies. Strategic Management Journal, 24(7), 677-686. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.327
Boehm, D. N., & Hogan, T. (2014). ‘A jack of all trades’: The role of PIs in the establishment and management of collaborative networks in scientific knowledge commercialisation. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 39(1), 134-149. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-012-9273-8
Burawoy, M., Burton, A., Ferguson, A. A., & Fox, K. J. (1991). Ethnography unbound: Power and resistance in the modern metropolis. Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.
Burawoy, M. (2009). The extended case method: Four countries, four decades, four great transformations, and one theoretical tradition. Los Angeles, California: University of California Press.
Burrell, G., & Morgan, G. (2006). Sociological paradigms and organizational analysis. Aldershot, UK: Gower.
Buzzao, G., & Rizzi, F. (2021). On the conceptualization and measurement of dynamic capabilities for sustainability: Building theory through a systematic literature review. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(1), 135-175. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2614
Cadori, A. A. (2013). A gestão do conhecimento aplicada ao processo de transferência de resultados de pesquisa de instituições federais de ciência e tecnologia para o setor produtivo: Processo mediado pelo Núcleo de Inovação Tecnológica (Doctoral dissertation). Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Engenharia e Gestão do Conhecimento, Florianópolis, SC, Brasil. Retrieved from https://repositorio.ufsc.br/handle/123456789/107018
Carvalho, I. V., & Cunha, N. C. V. (2013). Proposta de um modelo de transferência de tecnologia para as universidades públicas brasileiras. Anais do Congresso Latino-Iberoamericano de Gestão de Tecnologia (ALTEC), Porto, Portugal, 15.
Chais, C., Ganzer, P. P., & Olea, P. M. (2018). Technology transfer between universities and companies: Two cases of Brazilian universities. Innovation & Management Review, 15(1), 20-40. https://doi.org/10.1108/INMR-02-2018-002
Chesbrough, H. W. (2006). Open innovation: A new paradigm for understanding industrial innovation. In H. W. Chesbrough, W. Vanhaverbeke & J. West (Orgs.). Open innovation: Researching a new paradigm (1-27). New York: Oxford University Press.
Collis, D. J. (1994). Research note: How valuable are organizational capabilities? Strategic Management Journal, 15(S1), 143-152. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250150910
Collis, D. J., & Anand, B. N. (2021). The virtues and limitations of dynamic capabilities. Strategic Management Review, 2(1), 47-78. http://dx.doi.org/10.1561/111.00000017 
Connor, T. (2007). A consideration of strategic assets and the organizational sources of competitiveness. Strategic Change, 16(3), 127-136. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsc.789
Cozzi, A., Judice, V., & Dolabela, F. (2007). Empreendedorismo de base tecnológica. Spin-off: Criação de novos negócios a partir de empresas constituídas, universidades e centros de pesquisa. Rio de Janeiro: Elsevier.
Della-Corte, V., Aria, M., Del Gaudio, G., Barney, J. B., Cobanoglu, C., & Sepe, F. (2021). The relevance of relational capabilities in collaborative decisions. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 33(12), 4391-4417. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-01-2021-0037
Dias, A. A., & Porto, G. S. (2013). Gestão de transferência de tecnologia na Inova Unicamp. Revista de Administração Contemporânea, 17(3), 263-284. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1415-65552013000300002
Dias, A. A., & Porto, G. S. (2014). Como a USP transfere tecnologia? Organizações & Sociedade, 21(70), 489-507. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1984-92302014000300008
Eisenhardt, K. M., & Martin, J. A. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management Journal, 21(10-11), 1105-1121. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0266(200010/11)21:10/11<1105::AID-SMJ133>3.0.CO;2-E
Fernandes, C. R., & Machado, A. G. C. (2019). Technology transfer capability: Development dynamics in higher education institutions. Brazilian Business Review, 16(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.15728/bbr.2019.16.1.1
Ferreira, J., Coelho, A., & Moutinho, L. (2020). Dynamic capabilities, creativity and innovation capability and their impact on competitive advantage and firm performance: The moderating role of entrepreneurial orientation. Technovation, 92-93, 102061. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2018.11.004
Garcia, M., & Gava, R. (2012). Gestão da propriedade intelectual como suporte à inovação tecnológica: O caso do núcleo de inovação tecnológica da universidade federal de Viçosa. Revista de Design, Inovação e Gestão Estratégica, 3(3), 1-24.
Garrido, I. L., Kretschmer, C., Vasconcellos, S. L., & Gonçalo, C. R. (2020). Capacidades dinâmicas: Uma proposta de medição e sua relação com o desempenho. Brazilian Business Review, 17(1), 46-65. https://doi.org/10.15728/bbr.2020.17.1.3
Gebauer, H. (2011). Exploring the contribution of management innovation to the evolution of dynamic capabilities. Industrial Marketing Management, 40(8), 1238-1250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2011.10.003
Godfrey, P. C., & Hill, C. W. (1995). The problem of unobservables in strategic management research. Strategic Management Journal, 16(7), 519-533. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250160703
Grant, R. M., & Verona, G. (2015). What’s holding back empirical research into organizational capabilities? Remedies for common problems. Strategic Organization, 13(1), 61-74. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127014565988
Griffith, D. A., & Harvey, M. G. (2001). A resource perspective of global dynamics capabilities. Journal of International Business Studies, 32(3), 597-606. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490987
Harreld, J. B., O’Reilly III, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. (2007). Dynamic capabilities at IBM: Driving strategy into action. California Management Review, 49(4), 21-43. https://doi.org/10.2307/41166404
Heaton, S., Siegel, D. S., & Teece, D. J. (2019) Universities and innovation ecosystems: A dynamic capabilities perspective. Industrial and Corporate Change, 28(4), 921-939. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtz038
Helfat, C. E. (1997). Know-how and asset complementarity and dynamics capability accumulation: The case of R&D. Strategic Management Journal, 18(5), 339-360. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199705)18:5<339::AID-SMJ883>3.0.CO;2-7
Helfat, C. E., Finkelstein, S., Mitchell, W., Peteraf, M., Singh, H., Teece, D., & Winter, S. G. (2009). Dynamic capabilities: Understanding strategic change in organizations. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
Helfat, C. E., & Peteraf, M. A. (2003). The dynamic resource-based view: Capability lifecycles. Strategic Management Journal, 24(10), 997-1010. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.332
Helfat, C. E., & Peteraf, M. A. (2009). Understanding dynamics capabilities: Progress along a developmental path. Strategic Organization, 7(1), 91-102. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127008100133
Holzmayer, F., & Schmidt, S. L. (2020). Dynamic managerial capabilities, firm resources, and related business diversification: Evidence from the English Premier League. Journal of Business Research, 117, 132-143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.05.044
Jagoda, K., Maheshwari, B., & Lonseth, R. (2010). Key issues in managing technology transfer projects: Experiences from Canadian SME. Management Decision, 48(3), 366-382. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251741011037747
Kanter, R. M. (1989). Swimming in newstreams: Mastering innovation dilemmas. California Management Review, 31(4), 45-69. Retrieved from https://www.hbs.edu/faculty/Pages/item.aspx?num=10092
Laaksonen, O., & Peltoniemi, M. (2018). The essence of dynamic capabilities and their measurement. International Journal of Management Reviews, 20(2), 184-205. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12122
Lavie, D. (2006). Capability reconfiguration: An analysis of incumbent responses to technological change. Academy of Management Review, 31(1), 153-174. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2006.19379629
Lawson, B., & Samson, D. (2001). Developing innovation capability in organisations: A dynamic capabilities approach. International Journal of Innovation Management, 5(03), 377-400. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919601000427
Lee, J., Lee, K., & Rho, S. (2002). An evolutionary perspective on strategic group emergence: A genetic algorithm-based model. Strategic Management Journal, 23(8), 727-746. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.250
Lei n. 10.973, de 02 de dezembro de 2004. (2004). Dispõe sobre incentivos à inovação e à pesquisa científica e tecnológica no ambiente produtivo e dá outras providências. Diário Oficial da União. Brasília, DF: Presidência da República.
Lei n. 12.527, de 18 de novembro de 2011. (2011). Regula o acesso a informações previsto no inciso XXXIII do art. 5º, no inciso II do § 3º do art. 37 e no § 2º do art. 216 da Constituição Federal; altera a Lei nº 8.112, de 11 de dezembro de 1990; revoga a Lei nº 11.111, de 5 de maio de 2005, e dispositivos da Lei nº 8.159, de 8 de janeiro de 1991; e dá outras providências. Brasília, DF: Presidência da República.
Lei n. 13.243, de 11 de janeiro de 2016. (2016). Dispõe sobre estímulos ao desenvolvimento científico, à pesquisa, à capacitação científica e tecnológica e à inovação e altera a Lei nº 10.973, de 2 de dezembro de 2004, a Lei nº 6.815, de 19 de agosto de 1980, a Lei nº 8.666, de 21 de junho de 1993, a Lei nº 12.462, de 4 de agosto de 2011, a Lei nº 8.745, de 9 de dezembro de 1993, a Lei nº 8.958, de 20 de dezembro de 1994, a Lei nº 8.010, de 29 de março de 1990, a Lei nº 8.032, de 12 de abril de 1990, e a Lei nº 12.772, de 28 de dezembro de 2012, nos termos da Emenda Constitucional nº 85, de 26 de fevereiro de 2015. Diário Oficial da União. Brasília, DF: Presidência da República.
Lei Complementar n. 131, de 27 de maio de 2009. (2009). Acrescenta dispositivos à Lei Complementar n. 101, de 4 de maio de 2000, que estabelece normas de finanças públicas voltadas para a responsabilidade na gestão fiscal e dá outras providências, a fim de determinar a disponibilização, em tempo real, de informações pormenorizadas sobre a execução orçamentária e financeira da União, dos Estados, do Distrito Federal e dos Municípios. Diário Oficial da União. Brasília, DF: Presidência da República.
Leih, S., & Teece, D. (2016). Campus leadership and the entrepreneurial university: A dynamic capabilities perspective. Academy of Management Perspectives, 30(2), 182-210. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2015.0022
Lotufo, R. D. A. (2009). A institucionalização de núcleos de inovação tecnológica e a experiência da Inova Unicamp. In M. E. R. Santos, P. T. M. Toledo & R. A. Lotufo (Orgs.). Transferência de tecnologia: Estratégias para a estruturação e gestão de Núcleos de Inovação Tecnológica (Chap. 2, pp. 41-74). Campinas, SP: Komedi.
Makadok, R. (2001). Toward a synthesis of the resource-based and dynamics-capability views of rent creation. Strategic Management Journal, 22(5), 387-401. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.158
Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2015). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Ministério da Ciência, Tecnologia & Inovação. (2015). Política de propriedade intelectual das instituições científicas e tecnológicas do Brasil: Relatório FORMICT 2014. Brasília: Ministério da Ciência, Tecnologia e Inovação.
Moliterno, T. P., & Wiersema, M. F. (2007). Firm performance, rent appropriation, and the strategic resource divestment capability. Strategic Management Journal, 28(11), 1065-1087. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.630
Necoechea-Mondragón, H., Pineda-Domínguez, D., & Soto-Flores, R. (2013). A conceptual model of technology transfer for public universities in Mexico. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, 8(4), 24-35. http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-27242013000500003
O’Reilly, N. M., Robbins, P., & Scanlan, J. (2019). Dynamic capabilities and the entrepreneurial university: A perspective on the knowledge transfer capabilities of universities. Journal of Small Business & Entrepreneurship, 31(3), 243-263. https://doi.org/10.1080/08276331.2018.1490510
O’Reilly III, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. (2008). Ambidexterity as a dynamic capability: Resolving the innovator’s dilemma. Research in Organizational Behavior, 28, 185-206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2008.06.002
Pablo, A., Reay, T., Dewald, J. R., & Casebeer, A. L. (2007). Identifying, enabling and managing dynamic capabilities in the public sector. Journal of Management Studies, 44(5), 687-708. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00675.x
Pimentel, L. O. (2005). Propriedade intelectual e universidade: Aspectos legais. Florianópolis: Fundação Boiteux.
Pimentel, L. O. (2006). Propriedade intelectual e desenvolvimento. In P. L. Carvalho (Org.). Propriedade intelectual (pp. 41-59). Curitiba: Juruá Editora.
Pimentel, L. O. (2010). Manual básico de acordos de parceria de PD&I: Aspectos jurídicos. Porto Alegre: EDIPUCRS.
Pitsakis, K., & Giachetti, C. (2020). Information-based imitation of university commercialization strategies: The role of technology transfer office autonomy, age, and membership into an association. Strategic Organization, 18(4), 573-616. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127019850098
Rindova, V., & Taylor, M. S. (2002). Dynamic capabilities as macro and micro-organizational evolution [Working paper]. University of Maryland, Robert H. Smith School of Business, College Park, Maryland.
Rogers, E. M., Takegami, S., & Yin, J. (2001). Lessons learned about technology transfer. Technovation, 21(4), 253-261. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4972(00)00039-0
Romme, A. G. L., Zollo, M., & Berends, P. (2010). Dynamic capabilities, deliberate learning and environmental dynamism: A simulation model. Industrial and Corporate Change, 19(4), 1271-1299. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtq031
Rosenbloom, R. S. (2000). Leadership, capabilities, and technological change: The transformation of NCR in the electronic era. Strategic Management Journal, 21(10-11), 1083-1103. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0266(200010/11)21:10/11<1083::AID-SMJ127>3.0.CO;2-4
Schaeffer, V., Öcalan-Özel, S., & Pénin, J. (2020). The complementarities between formal and informal channels of university–industry knowledge transfer: A longitudinal approach. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 45(1), 31-55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-018-9674-4
Silva, A. V., & Machado, G. B. (2017). Uma visita teórica à abordagem capacidades dinâmicas a partir da perspectiva dos autores seminais Teece, Pisano e Shuen (1997): Um ensaio teórico. International Journal of Business Marketing, 2(1), 2447-7451. Retrieved from http://www.ijbmkt.org/index.php/ijbmkt/article/view/28
Silva, M., & Rossi, F. (2018). The effect of firms’ relational capabilities on knowledge acquisition and co-creation with universities. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 133, 72-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.03.004
Silva, V. A. B. D. (2018). A epistemologia de Michael Burawoy e seus desdobramentos metodológicos. Revista Direito e Práxis, 9(3), 1503-1530. https://doi.org/10.1590/2179-8966/2017/28989
Szulanski, G. (2000). The process of knowledge transfer: A diachronic analysis of stickiness. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 82(1), 9-27. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.2000.2884
Takahashi, V. P., & Sacomano, J. B. (2002). Proposta de um modelo conceitual para análise do sucesso de projetos de transferência de tecnologia: Estudo em empresas farmacêuticas. Gestão & Produção, 9(2), 181-200. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-530X2002000200006
Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamics capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319-1350. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.640
Teece, D. J. (2012). Dynamic capabilities: Routines versus entrepreneurial action. Journal of Management Studies, 49(8), 1395-1401. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2012.01080.x
Teece, D., Peteraf, M., & Leih, S. (2016). Dynamic capabilities and organizational agility: Risk, uncertainty, and strategy in the innovation economy. California Management Review, 58(4), 13-35. https://doi.org/10.1525/cmr.2016.58.4.13
Teece, D., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509-533. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7<509::AID-SMJ882>3.0.CO;2-Z
Vieira, V. M. M., & Ohayon, P. (2006). Inovação em fármacos e medicamentos: Estado-da-arte no Brasil e políticas de P&D. Revista Economia & Gestão, 6(13). Retrieved from http://periodicos.pucminas.br/index.php/economiaegestao/article/view/26
Wang, C. L., & Ahmed, P. K. (2007). Dynamic capabilities: A review and research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 9(1), 31-51. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2007.00201.x
Winter, S. G. (2003). Understanding dynamics capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 24(10), 991-995. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.318
Yuan, C., Li, Y., Vlas, C. O., & Peng, M. W. (2018). Dynamic capabilities, subnational environment, and university technology transfer. Strategic Organization, 16(1), 35-60. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127016667969
Zahra, S. A., Sapienza, H. J., & Davidsson, P. (2006). Entrepreneurship and dynamics capabilities: A review, model, and research agenda. Journal of Management Studies, 43(4), 917-955. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00616.x
Zappellini, M. B., & Feuerschütte, S. G. (2015). O uso da triangulação na pesquisa científica brasileira em administração. Administração: Ensino e Pesquisa, 16(2), 241-273. https://doi.org/10.13058/raep.2015.v16n2.238
Zollo, M., & Winter, S. (2002). Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamics capabilities. Organization Science, 13(3), 339-351. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.13.3.339.2780
Zott, C. (2003). Dynamic capabilities and the emergence of intraindustry differential firm performance: Insights from a simulation study. Strategic Management Journal, 24(2), 97-125. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.288