In Defense of Theory and Original Theoretical Contributions in Administration
Main Article Content
Abstract
This editorial proposes how to build original theoretical contributions in a context that privileges practice over theory, where Anglo-Saxon theories dominate the scientific field of administration, and it is even unclear what “theory” means. The central idea is that the approximation between theory and practice only exists when the theory is constructed in the concrete world, i.e., where practice happens. This means that the uncritical adoption of theories to understand specific realities leads to the false impression that “in theory, practice is different.” My conclusion is that the original theoretical contribution must consider the multiple ways of life, culture, and the constituent elements of the social phenomena one wants to research. Added to this is the appreciation of indigenous knowledge (scientific or otherwise) on the reality where one aims to offer an original theoretical contribution.
Download data is not yet available.
Article Details
Since mid-February of 2023, the authors retain the copyright relating to their article and grant the journal RAC, from ANPAD, the right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (CC BY 4.0), as stated in the article’s PDF document. This license provides that the article published can be shared (allows you to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format) and adapted (allows you to remix, transform, and create from the material for any purpose, even commercial) by anyone.
After article acceptance, the authors must sign a Term of Authorization for Publication, which is sent to the authors by e-mail for electronic signature before publication.
References
Bádéjọ, F. A., & Gordon, R. (2022). See finish! Scunnered!! A vernacular critique of hierarchies of knowledge in marketing. Marketing Theory, 22(2), 229–249. https://doi.org/10.1177/14705931221074724
Banerjee, S. B. (2022). Decolonizing management theory: A critical perspective. Journal of Management Studies, 59(4), 1074-1087. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12756
Barros, A., & Alcadipani, R. (2022). Decolonizing journals in management and organizations? Epistemological colonial encounters and the double translation. Management Learning. https://doi.org/10.1177/13505076221083204
Bispo, M. de S. (2020, April 29). Administração, pecado original e lei de natureza: O problema entre teoria e prática. Nuevo Blog. Retrieved from https://nuevoblog.com/2020/04/29/administracao-pecado-original-e-lei-de-natureza-o-problema-entre-teoria-e-pratica/
Bispo, M. de S. (2021a). Impacto da pesquisa em administração e negócios: Para quê? Para quem? International Journal of Business & Marketing, 6(2), 13-21. Retrieved from http://www.ijbmkt.org/index.php/ijbmkt/article/view/217
Bispo, M. de S. (2021b). Ensaiando sobre o velho e falso dilema entre teoria e prática. Teoria e Prática em Administração, 11(2), 174-178. https://doi.org/10.22478/ufpb.2238-104X.2021v11n2.59760
Bispo, M. de S., & Davel. E. P. (2021). Editorial: Educational impact of research. Organizações & Sociedade, 28(97), 219-226. https://doi.org/10.1590/1984-92302021v28n9700EN
Bourgeois, L. J. III. (1979). Toward a method of middle range theorizing. Academy of Management Review, 4(3), 443–447. https://doi.org/10.2307/257201
Bruton, G. D., Zahra, S. A., Van de Ven, A. H., & Hitt, M. A. (2022). Indigenous theory uses, abuses, and future. Journal of Management Studies, 59(4), 1057-1073. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12755
Cornelissen, J. P., & Durand, R. (2014). Moving forward: Developing theoretical contributions in management studies. Journal of Management Studies, 51(6), 995–1022.
Donovan, C. (2011). State of the art in assessing research impact: Introduction to a special issue. Research Evaluation, 20(3), 175-179. https://doi.org/10.3152/095820211X13118583635918
Edwards, D. M., & Meagher, L. R. (2020). A framework to evaluate the impacts of research on policy and practice: A forestry pilot study. Forest Policy and Economics, 114, 101975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2019.101975
Faria, J. H. (2022). It has gone and no one knows if it will return: The progressive disappearance of the original theory. Revista de Administração Contemporânea. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-7849rac2022220065.en
Foucault, M. (1987). Vigiar e punir: Nascimento da prisão. Petrópolis (RJ): Vozes.
Lundberg, C. C. (2004). Is there really nothing so practical as a good theory? Business Horizons, 47(5), 7-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2004.07.003
MacIntosh, R., Beech, N., Bartunek, J., Mason, K., Cooke, B., & Denyer, D. (2017). Impact and management research: Exploring relationships between temporality, dialogue, reflexivity and praxis. British Journal of Management, 28(1), 3–13. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12207
Man, A.-P., Luvison, D., & Leeuw, T. (2022). A temporal view on the academic–practitioner gap. Journal of Management Inquiry, 31(2), 181–196. https://doi.org/10.1177/1056492620982375
McGahan, A. M. (2007). Academic research that matters to managers: On zebras, dogs, lemmings, hammers, and turnips. Academy of Management Journal, 50(4), 748–753. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2007.26279166
Mello, A. M., & Pedroso, M. (2018). Applied research articles: Narrowing the gap between research and organizations. Revista de Gestão, 25(4), 338-339. https://doi.org/10.1108/REGE-10-2018-075
Merton, R. K. (1970). Sociologia: Teoria e estrutura. São Paulo: Mestre Jou.
Mills, C. W. (1959). The sociological imagination. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Muzio, D. (2022). Re-conceptualizing management theory: How do we move away from western-centred knowledge? Journal of Management Studies, 59(4), 1032-1035. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12753
Nobel, C. (2016, September 19). Why isn’t business research more relevant to business practitioners?. Harvard Business School Working Knowledge, 19 September. Retrieved from https://hbswk.hbs.edu/item/why-isn-t-business-research-more-relevant-to-business-practitioners#:~:text=Why%20Isn’t%20Business%20Research%20More%20Relevant%20to%20Business%20Practitioners%3F,-by%20Carmen%20Nobel&text=There’s%20a%20pervasive%20paradox%20in,enhance%20the%20relevance%20of%20research
Ramos, A. G. (1996). A redução sociológica. Rio de Janeiro: Ed. UFRJ.
Sandberg, J., & Alvesson, M. (2021). Meanings of theory: Clarifying theory through typification. Journal of Management Studies, 58(2), 487-516. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12587
Sandes-Guimarães, L. V., & Hourneaux, F., Junior. (2020). Research impact – what is it, after all? Editorial impact series part 1. RAUSP Management Journal, 55(3), 283-287. https://doi.org/10.1108/RAUSP-07-2020-202
Shepherd, D. A., & Suddaby, R. (2017). Theory building: A review and integration. Journal of Management, 43(1), 59–86. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316647102
Souza, J. (2017). A elite do atraso: Da escravidão à Lava Jato. São Paulo: LeYa.
Suddaby, R. (2014). Editor’s comments: Why theory? Academy of Management Review, 39(4), 407–11. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2014.0252
Swedberg, R. (2014). Theorizing in social science: The context of discovery. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Van de Ven, A. H. (1989). Nothing is quite so practical as a good theory. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 486-489. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1989.4308370
Williams, P., & Chrisman, L. (2015). Colonial discourse and post-colonial theory. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315656496