Agency of Objects in the Food Consumption Abandonment
Peer Review Report
Main Article Content
Abstract
Objective: we aim to understand how objects influence the practice of abandonment of unhealthy food categories. Theoretical background: previous studies explore different typologies to explain variations in anti-consumption behavior and abandonment of product categories from a consumer-oriented perspective. In this study, we follow the new materialism onto-epistemology to recognize that objects have agentic capacities in anti-consumption practices. Specifically, we highlight the abandonment of certain food categories as the interruption of an intersubjective relationship involving consumers and objects. Method: our empirical plan adopts an interpretive perspective to describe practices of abandonment of soft drinks and meats and the way consumers build new relationships with these objects. Data collection makes use of in-depth interviews. Results: the results indicate that the nutritional and production characteristics of these foods negatively impact the lives of consumers, other living beings, and nature. To mitigate this impact, consumers adopt abandonment practices attempting to break with the procedural relationship and the effects of these objects on their lives and on nature. Conclusions: theoretical contributions reveal that the procedural relationship between objects and consumers operates at different levels of complexity, according to the agentic capacity of the object, limiting or making easy the abandonment of unhealthy food categories.
Download data is not yet available.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Since mid-February of 2023, the authors retain the copyright relating to their article and grant the journal RAC, from ANPAD, the right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (CC BY 4.0), as stated in the article’s PDF document. This license provides that the article published can be shared (allows you to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format) and adapted (allows you to remix, transform, and create from the material for any purpose, even commercial) by anyone.
After article acceptance, the authors must sign a Term of Authorization for Publication, which is sent to the authors by e-mail for electronic signature before publication.
References
Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Bennett, J. (2005). The agency of assemblages and the North American blackout. Public Culture, 17(3), 445–466. https://doi.org/10.1215/08992363-17-3-445
Bennett, J. (2010). Vibrant matter: A political ecology of things. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Carolan, M. S. (2021). What is driving consumer food waste: Socio-material assemblages of household consumption practices. Appetite, 166, 105478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2021.105478
Coole, D. (2005). Rethinking agency: A phenomenological approach to embodiment and agentic capacities. Political Studies, 53(1), 124-142. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2005.00520.x
Coole, D. (2013). Agentic capacities and capacious historical materialism: Thinking with new materialisms in the political sciences. Millennium, 41(3), 451-469. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829813481006
Coole, D., & Frost, S. (2010). New materialisms: Ontology, Agency, and Politics. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Dalmoro, M., Matos, C. A., & Barcellos, M. D. (2020). Anticonsumption beyond consumers: The role of small organic producers in environmentally oriented anticonsumption. Psychology & Marketing, 37(2), 291-307. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21300
Dalmoro, M., Peñaloza, L., & Nique, W. M. (2014). Resistência do consumidor: Diferentes estágios teóricos de um mesmo conceito. Revista Brasileira de Marketing, 13(1), 119-132. https://doi.org/10.5585/remark.v13i1.2531
Dalpian, P. R., Silveira, T., & Rossi, C. A. (2015). “One less car” the collective initiative toward sustainability. Journal of Macromarketing, 35(1), 99-110. https://doi.org/10.1177/0276146714552904
Diniz, F., & Suarez, M. C. (2018). Cultural meanings and consumers’ discourses about their brand abandonment. BAR – Brazilian Administration Review, 15(1), e170061. https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-7692bar2018170061
Govier, E., & Steel, L. (2021). Beyond the ‘thingification’of worlds: Archaeology and the new materialisms. Journal of Material Culture, 26(3), 298-317. https://doi.org/10.1177/13591835211025559
Hogg, M. K. (1998). Anti-constellations: Exploring the impact of negation on consumption. Journal of Marketing Management, 14(1-3), 133-158. https://doi.org/10.1362/026725798784959354
Knappett, C. (2010). Thinking through material culture: An interdisciplinary perspective. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Latour, B. (2007). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lee, M. S., Egea, J. M. O., & Frutos, N. G. (2020). Anti‐consumption beyond boundaries: From niche topic to global phenomena. Psychology & Marketing, 37(2), 171-176. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21330
Lee, M., Roux, D., Cherrier, H., & Cova, B. (2011). Anti-consumption and consumer resistance: Concepts, concerns, conflicts and convergence. European Journal of Marketing, 45(11/12). https://doi.org/10.1108/ejm.2011.00745kaa.001
Leipämaa-Leskinen, H. (2021). Practicing mundane consumer resistance in the REKO local food system. Qualitative Market Research, 24(3), 341-357. https://doi.org/10.1108/QMR-06-2020-0073
Lofland, J., & Lofland, L. (1995). Analyzing social settings: A guide to qualitative observation and analysis (3 ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
Makri, K., Schlegelmilch, B. B., Mai, R., & Dinhof, K. (2020). What we know about anticonsumption: An attempt to nail jelly to the wall. Psychology & Marketing, 37(2), 177-215. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21319
Malek, L., Umberger, W., & Goddard, E. (2019). Is anti-consumption driving meat consumption changes in Australia?. British Food Journal, 121(1), 123-138. https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-03-2018-0183
McCracken, G. (1988). The long interview (Vol. 13). London: Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412986229
Mello, R., Almeida, S. O., & Dalmoro, M. (2021). The emperor’s new cosplay: The agency of an absent material on the consumption experience. Consumption Markets & Culture, 24(3), 241-261. https://doi.org/10.1080/10253866.2020.1756268
Pangarkar, A., Shukla, P., & Taylor, C. R. (2021). Minimalism in consumption: A typology and brand engagement strategies. Journal of Business Research, 127, 167-178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.01.033
Peñaloza, L., & Price, L. L. (1993). Consumer resistance: A conceptual overview. In L. McAlister & M. L. Rothschild (Eds.), NA - Advances in consumer research (Vol. 20, pp. 123-128). Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research.
Saldaña, J. (2015). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. London: Sage.
Santos, L. R., Silva, R. C. M., & Chauvel, M. A. (2013). Anticonsumo no Brasil: Investigando a percepção dos anticonsumidores de carne vermelha. Revista Brasileira de Marketing, 12(3), 23-44. https://doi.org/10.5585/remark.v12i3.2335
Schatzki, T. (2016). Practice theory as flat ontology. In G. Spaargaren, D. Weenink, & M. Lamers (Eds.), Practice theory and research: Exploring the dynamics of social life (pp. 28-42). London: Routledge.
Schouten, J., Martin, D., Blakj, H., & Botez, A. (2015). From counterculture movement to mainstream market: Emergence of the U.S. organic food industry. In R. Canniford & D. Bajde (Eds.), Assembling consumption: Researching actors, networks and markets (pp. 21-31). London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315743608
Sichieri, R. (2013). Consumo alimentar no Brasil e o desafio da alimentação saudável. ComCiência, (145). Retrieved from http://comciencia.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1519-76542013000100007&lng=pt&nrm=iso
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. London: Sage.
Suarez, M. C. (2010). Criação, movimento e negociação de significados a partir do não consumo: Um estudo do abandono das categorias de automóvel e cigarro (Doctoral dissertation). Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil. Retrieved from https://www.academia.edu/48687605/Cria%C3%A7%C3%A3o_Movimento_e_Negocia%C3%A7%C3%A3o_De_Significados_a_Partir_Do_N%C3%A3o_Consumo_Um_Estudo_Do_Abandono_Das_Categorias_De_Autom%C3%B3vel_e_Cigarro
Suarez, M. (2014). Meanings of consumption and abandonment: understanding smoking cessation symbolism. BAR – Brazilian Administration Review, 11(2), 210-227. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1807-76922014000200006
Suarez, M. C., Chauvel, M. A., & Casotti, L. (2012). Motivações e significados do abandono de categoria: Aprendizado a partir da investigação com ex-fumantes e ex-proprietários de automóveis. Cadernos EBAPE.BR, 10(2), 411-434. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1679-39512012000200010
Tosun, P., & Gürce, M. Y. (2018). Consumer comments about meat anti-consumption. British Food Journal, 120(10), 2439-2453. https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-12-2017-0685
Türe, M., & Ger, G. (2016). Continuity through change: Navigating temporalities through heirloom rejuvenation. Journal of Consumer Research, 43(1), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucw011
Warde, A., & Martens, L. (2000). Eating out: Social differentiation, consumption and pleasure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511488894
Wilson, M., Robson, K., & Pitt, L. (2022). Consumer subversion and its relationship to anti‐consumption, deviant and dysfunctional behaviors, and consumer revenge. Psychology & Marketing, 39(3), 598-611. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21583
Zavestoski, S. (2002). The social–psychological bases of anticonsumption attitudes. Psychology & Marketing, 19(2), 149-165. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.10007