Behavioral Economics and Auto Insurance: The Role of Biases and Heuristics



Main Article Content

Pedro Brandão Graminha
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1143-1917 orcid
Luís Eduardo Afonso
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4639-8299 orcid

Abstract

Objective: this paper analyzes how framing, anchoring, and certainty effects may affect the behavior of the consumer of auto insurance. Methods: an experiment was carried out, with the face-to-face application of six versions of a questionnaire with 14 questions, for 163 respondents from an educational institution. Questions were prepared to analyze the existence of the framing effect, the anchoring effect, and the certainty effect, in addition to the deductible effect (present in several insurance products). The theoretical framework of the paper is the behavioral economics. Results: younger people, singles, and men are more prone to risk. Although the findings in general corroborate the evidence in the literature, the results of the certainty effect were contrary to expectations. The payment of the deductible increased the respondents’ risk aversion. Conclusions: the existence of biases and heuristics can cause the purchase of insurance to occur in a non-optimal way. Knowledge of the decision-making process is important for insurers and consumers. It is also relevant for regulators, in order to subsidize measures aimed at market efficiency and consumer protection, through the design of an appropriate choice architecture.



Downloads

Download data is not yet available.


Article Details

How to Cite
Graminha, P. B., & Afonso, L. E. (2021). Behavioral Economics and Auto Insurance: The Role of Biases and Heuristics. Journal of Contemporary Administration, 26(5), e200421. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-7849rac2022200421.en
Section
Theoretical-empirical Articles

References

Baddeley, M. (2019). The unfolding landscape of behavioral economics: from the past to the future. Journal of Behavioral Economics for Policy, 3(1), 5–11. Retrieved from https://sabeconomics.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/JBEP-3-1-3-Baddeley_OnBE.pdf
Baker, T., & Siegelman, P. (2013). You want insurance with that; Using behavioral economics to protect consumers from add-on insurance products. Connecticut Insurance Law Journal, 115. Retrieved from https://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/faculty_scholarship/441/
Barsky, R. B., Juster, F. T., Kimball, M. S., & Shapiro, M. D. (1997). Preference parameters and behavioral heterogeneity: An experimental approach in the health and retirement study. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112(2), 537–579. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1162/003355397555280
Barth, M. M., Hatem, J. J., & Yang, B. Z. (2004). A pedagogical note on risk framing. Risk Management and Insurance Review, 7(2), 151–164. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1098-1616.2004.00042.x
Benartzi, S., Beshears, J., Milkman, K. L., Sunstein, C. R., Thaler, R. H., Shankar, M., Tucker-Ray, W., Congdon, W. J., & Galing, S. (2017). Should governments invest more in nudging? Psychological Science, 28(8), 1041–1055. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797617702501
Berg, L. (2014). Who benefits from behavioural economics? Economic Analysis and Policy, 44(2), 221–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2014.06.001
Borghans, L., Heckman, J. J., Golsteyn, B. H. H., & Meijers, H. (2009). Gender differences in risk aversion and ambiguity aversion. Journal of the European Economic Association, 7(2–3), 649–658. https://doi.org/10.1162/JEEA.2009.7.2-3.649
Brooks, C., Sangiorgi, I., Hillenbrand, C., & Money, K. (2018). Why are older investors less willing to take financial risks? International Review of Financial Analysis, 56, 52–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2017.12.008
Brown, J. R., Kling, J. R., Mullainathan, S., & Wrobel, M. V. (2008). Why don’t people insure late-life consumption? A framing explanation of the under-annuitization puzzle. American Economic Review, 98(2), 304–309. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.98.2.304
Chandra, A., Handel, B., & Schwartzstein, J. (2019). Behavioral economics and health-care markets. In D. Bernheim, S. DellaVigna, & D. Laibson (Eds.), Handbook of behavioral economics (Vol. 2, Chap. 6, pp. 459–502). Amsterdam: Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.hesbe.2018.11.004
Chaulk, B., Johnson, P., & Bulcroft, R. (2003). Effects of marriage and children on financial risk tolerance: A synthesis of family development and prospect theory. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 24(3), 257–279. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025495221519
Coe, N. B., Belbase, A., & Wu, A. Y. (2016). Overcoming barriers to life insurance coverage: A behavioral approach. Risk Management and Insurance Review, 19(2), 307–336. https://doi.org/10.1111/rmir.12064
Cohen, A., & Einav, L. (2007). Estimating risk preferences from deductible choice. American Economic Review, 97(3), 745–788. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.97.3.745
Cohen, A., & Siegelman, P. (2010). Testing for adverse selection in insurance markets. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 77(1), 39–84. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6975.2009.01337.x
Collier, B., Schwartz, D., Kunreuther, H. C., & Michel-Kerjan, E. O. (2017). Risk preferences in small and large stakes: Evidence from insurance contract decisions [Working Paper 23579]. National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA. https://doi.org/10.3386/w23579
Corcos, A., Montmarquette, C., & Pannequin, F. (2020). How the demand for insurance became behavioral. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 180, 590–595. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2020.09.001
Cruz, G. S. Z. (2017). Tomada de decisão em seguros: Os efeitos do contexto e da franquia dedutível para os tomadores de seguro auto (Undergraduate dissertation). Universidade de São Paulo, FEA, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Czibor, E., Jimenez-Gomez, D., & List, J. A. (2019). The dozen things experimental economists should do (More of) [Working Paper 25451]. National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA. https://doi.org/10.3386/w25451
Dhami, S. (2016). The foundations of behavioral economic analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dudley, S. E., & Xie, Z. (2020). Designing a choice architecture for regulators. Public Administration Review, 80(1), 151–156. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13112
Eisenhauer, J. G., & Ventura, L. (2003). Survey measures of risk aversion and prudence. Applied Economics, 35(13), 1477–1484. https://doi.org/10.1080/0003684032000151287
Gottlieb, D., & Mitchell, O. S. (2020). Narrow framing and long‐term care insurance. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 87(4), 861-893. https://doi.org/10.1111/jori.12290
Hansen, J. V., Jacobsen, R. H., & Lau, M. I. (2016). Willingness to pay for insurance in Denmark. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 83(1), 49–76. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6975.2013.12011.x
Harrison, G. W., & Ng, J. M. (2019). Behavioral insurance and economic theory: A literature review. Risk Management and Insurance Review, 22(2), 133–182. https://doi.org/10.1111/rmir.12119
Harrison, G. W., & Richter, A. (2016). Introduction: Symposium on the methodologies of behavioral insurance. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 83(1), 43–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/jori.12144
Hoffmann, R., Cam, M.-A., & Camilleri, A. R. (2019). Deciding to invest responsibly: Choice architecture and demographics in an incentivised retirement savings experiment. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 80, 219–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2019.04.005
Irandoust, M. (2017). Factors associated with financial risk tolerance based on proportional odds model: Evidence from Sweden. Journal of Financial Counseling and Planning, 28(1), 155–164. https://doi.org/10.1891/1052-3073.28.1.155
Jaspersen, J. G. (2016). Hypothetical surveys and experimental studies of insurance demand: A review. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 83(1), 217–255. https://doi.org/10.1111/jori.12100
Jaspersen, J. G., & Aseervatham, V. (2017). The influence of affect on heuristic thinking in insurance demand. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 84(1), 239–266. https://doi.org/10.1111/jori.12088
Jaspersen, J. G., Ragin, M. A., & Sydnor, J. R. (2019). Predicting insurance demand from risk attitudes [Working Paper 26508]. National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA. https://doi.org/10.3386/w26508
Jetter, M., & Walker, J. K. (2017). Anchoring in financial decision-making: Evidence from Jeopardy! Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 141, 164–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2017.07.006
Jianakoplos, N. A., & Bernasek, A. (2006). Financial risk taking by age and birth cohort. Southern Economic Journal, 72(4), 981-1001. https://doi.org/10.2307/20111864
Johnson, E. J., Hershey, J., Meszaros, J., & Kunreuther, H. (1993). Framing, probability distortions, and insurance decisions. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 7(1), 35–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01065313
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263–292. https://doi.org/10.2307/1914185
Kirchler, E., & Hoelzl, E. (2017). Economic psychology: An introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781139629065
Kremer, M., Rao, G., & Schilbach, F. (2019). Behavioral development economics. In B. D. Bernheim, S. DellaVigna, & D. Laibson (Eds.), Handbook of behavioral economics - applications and foundations 1 (Vol. 2, Chap. 5, pp. 345–458). Amsterdam: Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.hesbe.2018.12.002
Kunreuther, H. C., Pauly, M. V., & McMorrow, S. (2013). Insurance & behavioral economics: Improving decisions in the most misunderstood industry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kunreuther, H., & Pauly, M. (2020). Do people have a bias for low-deductible insurance? [Working Paper 26994]. National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA. https://doi.org/10.3386/w26994
Ledo, B. C. A., & Lopes, C. M. A. (2019). Estimating risk and risk aversion in the automobile insurance market. Brazilian Review of Econometrics, 39(1), 85–112. https://doi.org/10.12660/bre.v39n12019.73975
Levy, M. (2015). An evolutionary explanation for risk aversion. Journal of Economic Psychology, 46, 51–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2014.12.001
Lin, X. (2020). Feeling is believing? Evidence from earthquake shaking experience and insurance demand. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 87(2), 351–380. https://doi.org/10.1111/jori.12291
Marx, B. M., & Turner, L. J. (2019). Student loan nudges: Experimental evidence on borrowing and educational attainment. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 11(2), 108–141. https://doi.org/10.1257/pol.20180279
Mol, J. M., Botzen, W. J. W., & Blasch, J. E. (2020). Risk reduction in compulsory disaster insurance: Experimental evidence on moral hazard and financial incentives. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 84, 101500. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2019.101500
Mossin, J. (1968). Aspects of rational insurance purchasing. Journal of Political Economy, 76(4, Part 1), 553–568. https://doi.org/10.1086/259427
Muramatsu, R. (2020). Microfinanças e comportamento financeiro dos pobres: Algumas contribuições da economia comportamental. Brazilian Journal of Development, 6(5), 27275–27294. https://doi.org/10.34117/bjdv6n5-251
Ogaki, M., & Tanaka, S. C. (2019). Behavioral economics: Toward a new economics by integration with traditional economics. Singapore: Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6439-5
Outreville, J. F. (2014). Risk aversion, risk behavior and demand for insurance: A survey. Journal of Insurance Issues, 37(2), 158–186. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/43151298
Peres, V. M., Maldonado, W. L., & Candido, O. (2019). Automobile insurance in Brazil: Market concentration and demand. Revista Contabilidade & Finanças, 30(81), 396–408. https://doi.org/10.1590/1808-057x201808300
Pratt, J. W. (1964). Risk aversion in the small and in the large. Econometrica, 32(1/2), 122–136. https://doi.org/10.2307/1913738
Richter, A., Ruß, J., & Schelling, S. (2019). Insurance customer behavior: Lessons from behavioral economics. Risk Management and Insurance Review, 22(2), 183–205. https://doi.org/10.1111/rmir.12121
Richter, A., Schiller, J., & Schlesinger, H. (2014). Behavioral insurance: Theory and experiments. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 48(2), 85–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11166-014-9188-x
Robinson, P. J., & Botzen, W. J. W. (2019). Economic experiments, hypothetical surveys and market data studies of insurance demand against low‐probability/high‐impact risks: A systematic review of designs, theoretical insights and determinants of demand. Journal of Economic Surveys, 33(5), 1493–1530. https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.12332
Robinson, P. J., Botzen, W. J. W., Kunreuther, H., & Chaudhry, S. J. (2021). Default options and insurance demand. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 183, 39–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2020.12.017
Ruß, J., & Schelling, S. (2018). Multi cumulative prospect theory and the demand for cliquet-style guarantees. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 85(4), 1103–1125. https://doi.org/10.1111/jori.12195
Samson, A. (2017). Selected behavioral science concepts. In A. Samson (Ed.), The behavioral economics guide 2017 (pp. 82–114). London: Behavioral Science Solutions Ltd. Retrieved from http://www.behavioraleconomics.com/BEGuide2017.pdf
Schmidt, U. (2016). Insurance demand under prospect theory: A graphical analysis. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 83(1), 77–89. https://doi.org/10.1111/jori.12098
Schoemaker, P. J. H., & Kunreuther, H. C. (1979). An experimental study of insurance decisions. The Journal of Risk and Insurance, 46(4), 603–618. https://doi.org/10.2307/252533
Schubert, R., Brown, M., Gysler, M., & Brachinger, H. W. (1999). Financial decision-making: Are women really more risk averse? American Economic Review, 89(2), 381–385. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.89.2.381
Segal, U. (1988). Probabilistic insurance and anticipated utility. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 55(2), 287-297. https://doi.org/10.2307/253329
Seog, S. H. (2010). The economics of risk and insurance. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.
Stewart, R. E., & Stewart, B. D. (2001). The loss of the certainty effect. Risk Management and Insurance Review, 4(2), 29–49. https://doi.org/10.1111/1098-1616.00004
Sydnor, J. (2010). (Over)insuring modest risks. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 2(4), 177–199. https://doi.org/10.1257/app.2.4.177
Thaler, R. H., & Sunstein, C. R. (2008). Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. Westminster, England: Penguin Books.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases: Biases in judgments reveal some heuristics of thinking under uncertainty. Science, 185(4157), 1124–1131. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.185.4157.1124
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211(4481), 453–458. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.7455683
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1992). Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5(4), 297–323. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00122574
Von Neumann, J., & Morgenstern, O. (1944). Theory of games and economic Behavior. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Wakker, P. P., Thaler, R. H., & Tversky, A. (1997). Probabilistic insurance. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 15(1), 7–28. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007799303256
Watt, R., Vázquez, F. J., & Moreno, I. (2001). An experiment on rational insurance decisions. Theory and Decision, 51(2–4), 247–296. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015559127778
Xiao, J. J., & Porto, N. (2019). Present bias and financial behavior. Financial Planning Review, 2(2), e1048. https://doi.org/10.1002/cfp2.1048
Zietz, E. N. (2003). An examination of the demand for life insurance. Risk Management and Insurance Review, 6(2), 159–191. https://doi.org/10.1046/J.1098-1616.2003.030.x