Motivations and Consequences of Advisor Participation in Mergers and Acquisitions
Main Article Content
Abstract
Mergers and Acquisitions (M&A) is a widely studied subject in finance. A question that remains unanswered is the role and impact of the advisor’s choice in the process of acquiring or merging. The current literature focuses on studying the US market/developed countries with different characteristics of an emerging market oriented toward the ownership of firms. Using data from more than 7,000 operations, this paper investigates the role of advisors in the negotiation and success rate and seeks to determine the characteristics for their participation. Linear and logistic regression revealed that the advisors play an active role due to the significantly longer period between the announcement and conclusion of the deal in which they participated. We also identified a higher success rate in comparison with in-house deals. Regarding the determinants, complexity, size of the deal, the acquirer’s previous experience in M&A, and payment entirely in shares increases the probability of hiring an advisor.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Download data is not yet available.
Article Details
How to Cite
Ermel, M. D. A., & Martelanc, R. (2018). Motivations and Consequences of Advisor Participation in Mergers and Acquisitions. Journal of Contemporary Administration, 22(6), 859-884. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-7849rac2018170282
Section
Articles
This journal remains the copyright holder of articles published. In order to be published, authors must sign the Transfer of Copyrights Document, which is sent to the authors by e-mail, thus granting rights, including on translation, to the Journal of Contemporary Administration. The journal grants third parties the right to use, reproduce, and share the article according to the Creative Commons license agreement (CC-BY 4.0), as stated in the article’s PDF documents.