Reflecting on Contemporary Administration
Main Article Content
Abstract
In my first editorial of Journal of Contemporary Administration (RAC), I would like to start by expressing my joy and drive to continue the scientific and editorial work of this nearly 25-year-old journal. I am grateful both to the current ANPAD board (2021-2024) for their trust in me and to all editors that preceded me (Clóvis Luiz Machado-da-Silva, César Gonçalves Neto, Tomas de Aquino Guimarães, Rogério Hermida Quintella, Herbert Kimura, and Wesley Mendes-da-Silva) for their contributions to leading RAC to its current level of excellence. I hope to measure up (along with the entire editorial team) and I will do all my best to keep RAC as a national reference and contribute to its international prestige in the field of administration. I am quite aware of the responsibilities and challenges ahead.
Download data is not yet available.
Article Details
Since mid-February of 2023, the authors retain the copyright relating to their article and grant the journal RAC, from ANPAD, the right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (CC BY 4.0), as stated in the article’s PDF document. This license provides that the article published can be shared (allows you to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format) and adapted (allows you to remix, transform, and create from the material for any purpose, even commercial) by anyone.
After article acceptance, the authors must sign a Term of Authorization for Publication, which is sent to the authors by e-mail for electronic signature before publication.
References
Almeida, E. A. A. (2012). Charles Baudelaire: Contemporâneo do passado, do presente e do futuro. Revista Poiésis, 13(20), 73-84. https://doi.org/10.22409/poiesis.1320.73-84
Alvesson, M., & Willmott, H. (1992). Critical management studies. London: Sage.
Aristóteles. (1997). PolÃtica (3 ed.). BrasÃlia: Editora Universidade de BrasÃlia.
Bispo, M. de S. (2021). Ensaiando sobre o velho e falso dilema entre teoria e prática. Teoria e Prática em Administração, 11(2), 174-178. https://doi.org/10.22478/ufpb.2238-104X.2021v11n2.59760
Bispo, M. de S., & Davel, E. P. (in press). Editorial: Impacto educacional da pesquisa. Organizações & Sociedade, in press.
Cabantous, L., & Gond, J.-P. (2011). Rational decision making as performative praxis: Explaining rationality’s éternel retour. Organization Science, 22(3), 573–586. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1100.0534
Clegg, S. R. (2014). Managerialism: Born in the USA. Academy of Management Review, 39(4), 566-585. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2014.0129
Dardot, P., & Laval, C. (2013). The new way of the world: On neoliberal society. New York: Verso.
Edwards, D. M., & Meagher, L. R. (2020). A framework to evaluate the impacts of research on policy and practice: A forestry pilot study. Forest Policy and Economics, 114, 101975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2019.101975
Fleming, P., & Oswick, C. (2014). Educating consent? A conversation with Noam Chomsky on the university and business school education, Organization, 21(4), 568–578. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508413514748
Ghoshal, S. (2005). Bad management theories are destroying good management practices. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 4(1), 75–91. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2005.16132558
Godin, B., & Doré, C. (2005). Measuring the impacts of science: Beyond the economic dimension. Helsinki, Finland: Helsinki Institute for Science and Technology Studies. Retrieved from www.csiic.ca/PDF/Godin_Dore_Impacts.pdf
Gunn, A., & Mintrom, M. (2017). Evaluating the non-academic impact of academic research: Design considerations. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 39(1), 20–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080X.2016.1254429
Klikauer, T. (2013). Managerialism: A critique of an ideology. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.
Lundberg, C. C. (2004). Is there really nothing so practical as a good theory? Business Horizons, 47(5), 7-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2004.07.003
Nunes, E. de O. (2010). A gramática polÃtica do Brasil: Clientelismo, corporativismo e insulamento burocrático (4 ed.). Rio de Janeiro: Garamond.
Pacheco, E. M. (2010). Dos poros ao sopro: A dimensão estética da experiência. In E. A. Lima, J. L. Ferreira Neto, L. E. Aragon (Orgs.), Subjetividade contemporânea: Desafios teóricos e metodológicos (Chap. 6, pp. 85-94). Curitiba: Editora CRV.
Pio, E, & Waddock, S. (2021). Invoking indigenous wisdom for management learning. Management Learning, 52(3), 328-346. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350507620963956
Pitman, T., & Berman, J. E. (2009). Of what benefit and to whom? Linking Australian humanities research with its ‘end users’. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 31(4), 315-326. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600800903191955
Rancière, J. (2005). A partilha do sensÃvel: Estética e polÃtica. São Paulo: Editora 34.
Rhodes, C., & Fleming, P. (2020). Forget political corporate social responsibility. Organization, 27(6), 943–951. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508420928526
Sandes-Guimarães, L. V., & Hourneaux, F., Junior. (2020). Research impact – what is it, after all? Editorial impact series part 1. RAUSP Management Journal, 55(3), 283-287. https://doi.org/10.1108/RAUSP-07-2020-202
Van de Ven, A. H. (1989). Nothing is quite so practical as a good theory. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 486-489. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1989.4308370
Zanoni, P., Contu, A., Healy, S., & Mir, R. (2017). Post-capitalistic politics in the making: The imaginary and praxis of alternative economies. Organization, 24(5), 575–588. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508417713219