A Qualitative Method Proposal for the Study of Strategy as Practice



Main Article Content

Leonardo Lemos da Silveira Santos
César Tureta
Bruno Felix

Abstract

Purpose: recently, the strategy as practice approach has sought to overcome the micro/macro dichotomy existing in its literature, as well as to better integrate the dimensions of praxis, practice and practitioner. To fill this gap, the aim of the paper is to discuss potential methods to guide empirical studies of strategy as practice (SAP). Method: the paper proposes a method based on an extensive literature review. Phenomenology, grounded theory, ethnography, and narratives are discussed, and their components are presented in the context of strategy as practice studies. Results: the presented method articulates four approaches. Phenomenology is used to enhance the understanding of strategist experiences. Grounded theory is considered a method to develop theories about the studied phenomenon. Ethnography is used to contextualize the daily practices of strategists. Narratives are the path to access the stories of the strategists. Conclusion: the proposed method may be useful to overcome micro/macro dichotomy existing in strategy as practice literature and to integrate praxis, practice and practitioner dimensions.



Downloads

Download data is not yet available.


Article Details

How to Cite
Santos, L. L. da S., Tureta, C., & Felix, B. (2020). A Qualitative Method Proposal for the Study of Strategy as Practice . Journal of Contemporary Administration, 25(2), e190353. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-7849rac2021190353.en
Section
Articles

References

Adorisio, A. L. M. (2014). Organizational remembering as narrative: ‘Storying’ the past in banking. Organization, 21(4), 463–476. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508414527248
Alammar, F. M., Interazi, A., Cardow, A., & Pauleen, D. J. (2019). Grounded theory in practice: novice researchers’ choice between Straussian and Glaserian. Journal of Management Inquiry, 28(2) 228–245. https://doi.org/10.1177/1056492618770743
Alvesson, M., & Karreman, D. (2000). Taking the linguistic turn in organizational research: challenges, responses and consequences. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 36(2), 136-159. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886300362002
Alvesson, M., & Sandberg, J. (2011). Generating research questions through problematization. Academy of Management Review, 36(2), 247–271. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2009.0188
Atkinson, P., Coffey, A., Delamont, S., Lofland, J., & Lofland, L. (2001). Editorial introduction. In P. Atkinson, A. Coffey, S. Delamont, J. Lofland, & L. Lofland (Eds.), Handbook of ethnography (pp. 1-7). London: Sage Publications.
Balogun, J., Huff, A. S., & Johnson, P. (2003). Three responses to the methodological challenges of studying strategizing. Journal of Management Studies, 40(1), 197-224. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6486.t01-1-00009
Bansal, P., Smith, W. K., & Vaara, E. (2018). From the editors: New ways of seeing through qualitative research. Academy of Management Journal, 61(4), 1189–1195. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2018.4004
Barry, E., Carroll, B., & Hansen, H. (2006). To text or context? Endotextual, exotextual and multi-textual approaches to narrative and discursive organizational studies. Organization Studies, 27(8), 1091-1110. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840606064568
Bernard, H. R., & Gravlee, C. C. (2015). Handbook of methods in cultural anthropology. London: Rowman & Littlefield.
Bertaux, D. (1980). L’approche biographique: sa validité méthodologique, ses potentialités. Cahiers lnternationaux de Sociologie, 69, 197–225.
Boje, D. M. (2001). Narrative methods for organizational and communication research. London: Sage Publications.
Boje, D. M., Haley, U. C. V., & Saylors, R. (2016). Antenarratives of organizational change: the microstoria of Burger King’s storytelling in space, time and strategic context. Human Relations, 69(2), 391–418. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726715585812
Boje, D. M., Rosile, G. A., Saylors, J., & Saylors, R. (2015). Using storytelling theatrics for leadership training. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 17(3), 348–362. https://doi.org/10.1177/1523422315587899
Bouty, I., Gomez, M. L., & Chia, R. (2019). Strategy emergence as wayfinding. M@n@gement, 22(3), 438-465. Retrieved from https://search.proquest.com/openview/fa2a8425902a5624f18ca121d2f228ed/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=286201#:~:text=We%20thus%20contribute%20to%20strategy,unexpectedly%20produce%20a%20coherent%20strategy.
Bryant, A. (2017). Grounded theory and grounded theorizing: Pragmatism in research practice. New York: Oxford University Press.
Burkea, G. T., & Wolf, C. (2020). The process affordances of strategy toolmaking when addressing wicked problems. Journal of Management Studies, online first, 1-30. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12572
Charmaz, K. (2000). Constructivist and objectivist grounded theory. In N. K. Denzin, & Y. S. Lincoln, (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 397-412). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. London: Sage Publications.
Charmaz, K., & Mitchell, R. G. (2001). Grounded theory in ethnography. In P. Atkinson, A. Coffey, S. Delamont, J. Lofland, & L. Lofland (Eds.), Handbook of ethnography (pp. 160-174). London: Sage Publications.
Chia, R. (1995). From modern to postmodern organizational analysis. Organizational Studies, 16(4), 579-604. https://doi.org/10.1177/017084069501600406
Chia, R. (2003). Ontology: Organization as “world-making”. In R. Westwood, & S. Clegg, (Org.). Debating organization: Point-counterpoint in organization studies. (pp. 98-112). Oxford: Blackwell.
Chia, R. (2004). Strategy-as-practice: reflections on the research agenda. European Management Review, 1(1), 29-34. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.emr.1500012
Chia, R., & Holt, R. (2006). Strategy as practical coping: A Heideggerian perspective. Organization Studies, 27(5), 635-655. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840606064102
Chia, R., & MacKay, B. (2007). Post-processual challenges for the emerging strategy-as-practice perpsective: Discovering strategy in the logic of practice. Human Relations, 60(1), 217-242. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726707075291
Chia, R., & Rasche, A. (2010). Epistemological alternatives for researching strategy as practice: building and dwelling worldviews. In D. Golsorkhi, L. Rouleau, D. Seidl, & Vaara, E. (Eds), Cambridge handbook of strategy as practice (pp. 34-46). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Conklin, T. (2012). Work worth doing: A phenomenological study of the experience of discovering and following one’s calling. Journal of Management Inquiry, 21(3), 298–317. https://doi.org/10.1177/1056492611414426
Cope, J. (2005). Researching entrepreneurship through phenomenological inquiry: philosophical and methodological issues. International Small Business Journal, 23(2), 163-189. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242605050511
Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (1990). Grounded theory research: procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Qualitative Sociology, 13(1), 3-21. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF00988593
Corley, K. G. (2015). A commentary on “what grounded theory is…”: Engaging a phenomenon from the perspective of those living it. Organizational Research Methods, 18(4), 600-605. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428115574747
Cunliffe, A. L. (2010). Retelling tales of the field in search of organizational ethnography 20 years on. Organizational Research Methods, 13(2), 224-239. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428109340041
Cunliffe, A. (2015). Using ethnography in strategy-as-practice research. In D. Golsorkhi, L. Rouleau, D. Seidl, & E. Vaara (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of strategy as practice (pp. 431-446). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cunliffe, A. L., & Alcadipani, R. (2016). The politics of access in fieldwork: Immersion, backstage dramas, and deception. Organizational Research Methods, 19(4), 535-561. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428116639134
Cunliffe, A. L., & Karunanayake, G. (2013). Working within hyphen-spaces in ethnographic research: Implications for research identities and practice. Organizational Research Methods, 16(3), 364-392. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428113489353
Cunliffe, A. L., Luhmann, J. T., & Boje, D. (2004). Narrative temporality: implications for organizational research. Organization Studies, 25(2), 261-286. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840604040038
Czarniawska, B. (1998). A narrative approach to organization studies. London: Sage Publications.
De La Ville, V. I., & Mounoud, E. (2010). A narrative approach to strategy as practice: Strategy making from texts and narratives. In D. Golsorkhi, L. Rouleau, D. Seidl, & E. Vaara (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of strategy as practice (pp. 183-197). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Denis, J. L., Langley, A., & Rouleau, L. (2007). Studying strategizing in pluralistic contexts: rethinking theoretical frames. Human Relation, 60(1), 179-215. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726707075288
Eisenhardt, K. M., Graebner, M. E., & Sonenshein, S. (2016). Grand challenges and inductive methods: rigor without rigor mortis. Academy of Management Journal, 59(4), 1113–1123. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2016.4004
Emerson, R. M., Fretz, R. I., & Shaw, L. L. (1995). Writing ethnographic fieldnotes. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Feldman, M. S., & Orlikowski, W. J. (2011). Theorizing practice and practicing theory. Organization Science, 22(5), 1240–1253. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1100.0612
Felix, B., Mello, A., & von Borell, D. (2018). Voices unspoken? Understanding how gay employees co-construct a climate of voice/silence in organisations. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 29(5), 805-828. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2016.1255987
Fenton, C., & Langley, A. (2011). Strategy as practice and the narrative turn. Organization studies, 32(9), 1171–1196. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840611410838
Fine, G. A. (2003). Towards a peopled ethnography: Developing theory from group life. Ethnography, 4(1), 41–60. https://doi.org/10.1177/1466138103004001003
Fook, J. (2002). Theorizing from practice towards an inclusive approach for social work research. Qualitative Social Work, 1(1), 79–95. https://doi.org/10.1177/147332500200100106
Gabriel, Y. (2000), Storytelling in organizations: facts, fictions and fantasies, Sage Publications, London.
Gehman, J., Glaser, V. L., Eisenhardt, K. M., Gioia, D., Langley, A., & Corley, K. G. (2018). Finding theory–method fit: a comparison of three qualitative approaches to theory building. Journal of Management Inquiry, 27(3), 284-300. https://doi.org/10.1177/1056492617706029
Gherardi, S. (2009). Introduction: The critical power of the practice lens. Management Learning, 40(2), 115-128. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350507608101225
Gill, M. J. (2014). The possibilities of phenomenology for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 17(2), 118-137. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428113518348
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. (2006). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategy for qualitative research. New Burnswick, London: Aldine.
Golsorkhi, D., Rouleau, L., Seidl, D., & Vaara, E. (2010). Introduction: What is Strategy as Practice? In D. Golsorkhi, L. Rouleau, D. Seidl, & E. Vaara. (Eds.). Cambridge Handbook of Strategy as Practice. (pp. 1-20). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Goulding, C. (1998). Grounded theory: The missing methodology on the interpretivist agenda. Qualitative Market Research, 1(1), 50-57. https://doi.org/10.1108/13522759810197587
Goulding, C. (2002). Grounded theory: A practical guide for management, business and market researchers. London: Sage Publications.
Goulding, C. (2005). Grounded theory, ethnography and phenomenology: A comparative analysis of three qualitative strategies for marketing research. European Journal of Marketing 39(3-4), 294-308. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090560510581782
Goulding, C. (2017). Navigating the complexities of grounded theory research in advertising. Journal of Advertising, 46(1), 61–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2017.1281775
Gubrium, J. F., & Holstein, J. A. (1999). At the border of narrative and ethnography. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 28(5), 561-573. https://doi.org/10.1177/089124199129023550
Hammersley, M. (1992). What´s wrong with ethnography. New York: Routledge.
Hansen, H. (2006). The ethnonarrative approach. Human Relations, 59(8), 1049-1075. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726706068770
Hautz, J., Seidl, D., & Whittington, R. (2017). Open strategy: Dimensions, dilemmas, dynamics. Long Range Planning, 50(3), 298–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2016.12.001
Heidegger, M. (1962). Being and time. New York: Harper and Row.
Hendry, J., & Seidl, D. (2003). The structure and significance of strategic episodes: Social systems theory and the routine practices of strategic change. Journal of Management Studies, 40(1), 175–196. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6486.00008
Hendry, K. P., Kiel, G. C., & Nicholson, G. (2010). How boards strategise: A strategy as practice view. Long Range Planning, 43(1), 33-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2009.09.005
Holstein, J., Starkey, K., & Wright, M. (2018). Strategy and narrative in higher education. Strategic Organization, 16(1), 61–91. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127016674877
Humphries, C., & Smith, A. C. T. (2014). Talking objects: Towards a postsocial research framework for exploring object narratives. Organization, 21(4), 477–494. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508414527253
Hydle, K. M. (2015). Temporal and spatial dimensions of strategizing. Organization Studies, 36(5), 643–663. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840615571957
Ingold, T. (2000). The perception of the environment. New York: Routledge.
Iszatt-White, M. (2010). Strategic leadership: The accomplishment of strategy as a ‘perennially unfinished. Leadership, 6(4), 409–424. https://doi.org/10.1177/1742715010379310
Iversen, R. R. (2009). Getting out in ethnography: A seldom-told story. Qualitative Social Work, 8(1), 9–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473325008100423
Jarzabkowski, P. (2005). Strategy as Practice: an activity-based approach. London: Sage Publications.
Jarzabkowski, P., & Fenton, E. (2006). Strategizing and organizing in pluralistic contexts. Long Range Planning, 39(6), 631-648. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2006.11.002
Jarzabkowski, P., & Seidl, D. (2008). The role of meetings in the social practice of strategy. Organization Studies, 29(11), 1391–1426. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840608096388
Jarzabkowski, P., & Wilson, D.C. (2002). Top teams and strategy in a UK university. Journal of Management Studies, 39(3), 357–383. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6486.00296
Jarzabkowski, P., Balogun, J., & Seidl, D. (2007). Strategizing: The challenges of a practice perspective. Human Relations, 60(1), 5-27. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726707075703
Jarzabkowski, P., Bednarek, R., & Cabantous, L. (2014). Conducting global team-based ethnography: Methodological challenges and practical methods. Human Relations, 68(1), 3–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726714535449
Jarzabkowski, P., Kaplan, S., Seidl, D., & Whittington, R. (2016). On the risk of studying practices in isolation: Linking what, who, and how in strategy research. Strategic Organization, 14(3), 248-259. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127015604125
Jarzabkowski, P. & Spee, A. P. (2009). Strategy-as-practice: a review and future directions for the field. International Journal of Management Reviews, 11(1), 69–95. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2008.00250.x
Johnson, G., Langley, A., Melin, L., & Whittington, R. (2007). Strategy as practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Johnson, G., Melin, L., & Whittington, R. (2003). Micro strategy and strategizing: Towards an activity-based view. Journal of Management Studies, 40(1), 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6486.t01-2-00002
Johnson, G. Smith, S., & Colding, B. (2010). Institutional change and strategic agency: an empirical analysis of managers’ experimentation with routines in strategic decision-making. In D. Golsorkhi, L. Rouleau, D. Seidl, & E. Vaara (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of strategy as practice (pp. 273-290). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kalou, Z., & Sadler-Smith, E. (2015). Using ethnography of communication in organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 18(1), 629-655. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428115590662
Kouamé, S. & Langley, A. (2018). Relating microprocesses to macro-outcomes in qualitative strategy process and practice research. Strategic Management Journal, 39(3), 559-581. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2726
Küpers, W. (2005). Phenomenology of embodied implicit and narrative knowing. Journal of Knowledge Management, 9(6), 114-133. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270510630006
Küpers, W. (2009). The status and relevance of Phenomenology for integral research: Or Why Phenomenology is more and different than an “upper left” or “zone #1” affair. Integral Review, 5(1), 51-95. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Wendelin_Kuepers/publication/26627228_The_Status_and_Relevance_of_Phenomenology_for_Integral_Research_Or_Why_Phenomenology_is_More_and_Different_than_an_Upper_Left_or_Zone_1_Affair/links/0deec52838195df031000000.pdf
Küpers, W., Mantere, S., & Statler, M. (2013). Strategy as storytelling: A phenomenological collaboration. Journal of Management Inquiry, 22(1), 83–100. https://doi.org/10.1177/1056492612439089
Laslett, B. (1999). Personal narratives as sociology. Contemporary Sociology, 28(4), 391-401. https://doi.org/10.2307/2655287
LeCompte, M. D., & Goetz, J. P. (1982). Problems of reliability and validity in ethnographic research. Review of Educational Research, 52(1), 31-60. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543052001031
Lofland, J. (1995). Analytic ethnography: Features, failings, and futures. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 24(1), 30-67. https://doi.org/10.1177/089124195024001002
Mantere, S., & Whittington, R. (2020). Becoming a strategist: The roles of strategy discourse and ontological security in managerial identity work. Strategic Organization, online first, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127020908781
Miettinen, R., Samra-Fredericks, D., & Yanow, D. (2009). Re-turn to practice: An introductory essay. Organization Studies, 30(12), 1309–1327. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840609349860
Mills, J., Bonner, A., & Francis, K. (2006). Adopting a constructivist approach to grounded theory: Implications for research design. International Journal of Nursing Practice, 12(8), 8-13. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-172X.2006.00543.x
Mintzberg, H. (1979). The structuring of organizations: A synthesis of the research. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
Murphy, S. A., & O’Brien, A. (2006). Listening above the din: The potential of language in organizational research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5(2), 87-110. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690600500211
Nicolini, D. (2009a). Zooming in and out: Studying practices by switching theoretical lenses and trailing connections. Organization Studies, 30(12), 1391–1418. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0170840609349875
Nicolini, D. (2009b). Articulating practice through the interview to the double. Management Learning, 40(2), p. 195-212. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1350507608101230
Orlikowski, W. J (2010). Practice in research: phenomenon, perspective and philosophy. In D. Golsorkhi, L. Rouleau, D. Seidl, & E. Vaara (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of strategy as practice (pp. 23-33). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Paroutis, S., & Pettigrew, A. (2007). Strategizing in the multi-business firm: Strategy teams at multiple levels and over time. Human Relations, 60(1), 99-135. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0018726707075285
Patriota, G. (2003). Sensemaking on the Shop Floor: Narratives of Knowledge in Organizations. Journal of Management Studies, 40(2), 349-375. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6486.00343
Pettigrew, S. F. (2000). Ethnography and grounded theory: a happy marriage? Advances in Consumer Research, 27, 256-331. Retrieved from https://www.acrwebsite.org/volumes/8400/volumes/v27/NA-
Prus, R. (1987). Generic social processes: maximizing conceptual development in ethnographic research. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 16(3), 250-293. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891241687163002
Quay, J. (2016). Learning phenomenology with Heidegger: experiencing the phenomenological ‘starting point’ as the beginning of phenomenological research. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 48(5), 484–497. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2015.1035632
Rasche, A., & Chia, R. (2009). Researching strategy practices: A genealogical social theory perspective. Organization Studies, 30(7), 713-734. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840609104809
Reckwitz, A. (2002). Toward a theory of social practices: A development in culturalist theorizing. European Journal of Social Theory, 5(2), 243-263. https://doi.org/10.1177/13684310222225432
Regnér, P. (2003). Strategy creation in the periphery: Inductive versus deductive strategy making. Journal of Management Studies, 40(1), 57–82. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6486.t01-1-00004
Rhodes, C., & Brown, A. D. (2005). Narrative, organizations and research. International Journal of Management Reviews, 7(3), 167-188. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2005.00112.x
Riessman, C. K. (1993). Narrative analysis (Vol. 30, Qualitative Research Methods). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
Rosen, M. (1991). Coming to terms with the field: Understanding and doing organizational ethnography. Journal of Management Studies, 28(1), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.1991.tb00268.x
Rouleau, L. (2005). Micro-practices of strategic sensemaking and sensegiving: How middle managers interpret and sell change every day. Journal of Management Studies, 42(7), 1413-1441. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2005.00549
Rouleau, L. (2006). Comprendre la fabrique de la stratégie à partir des récits de pratiques. In D. Golsorkhi. (Ed.). La fabrique de la stratégie: une perspective multidimensionnelle. Paris: Institut Vital Roux-Librairie Vuibert.
Rouleau, L. (2010). Studying strategizing through narratives of practice. In D. Golsorkhi, L. Rouleau, D. Seidl, & E. Vaara (Eds.), Cambridge Handbook of Strategy as Practice (pp. 258-270). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Samra-Fredericks, D. (2003). Strategizing as lived experience and strategists’ everyday efforts to shape strategic direction. Journal of Management Studies, 40(1), 142–174. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6486.t01-1-00007
Sanders, P. (1982). Phenomenology: a new way of viewing organizational research. Academy of Management Review, 7(3), 353-360. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1982.4285315
Sandberg, J., & Dall’Alba, G. (2009). Returning to practice anew: A life-world perspective. Organization Studies, 30(12), 1349–1368. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840609349872
Schatzki, T. R. (1996). Social practice: A wittgensteinian approach to human activity and the social. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schatzki, T. R. (2002). The site of the social: A philosophical account of the constitution of social life and change. Pennsylvania: Pennsylvania State University.
Schatzki, T. R. (2005). Peripheral vision: The sites of organizations. Organization Studies, 26(3), 465-484. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840605050876
Schatzki, T. R., Knorr-Cetina, K., & Savigny, E. von. (2001). The practice turn in contemporary. London: Routledge.
Seidl, D., & Whittington, R. (2014). Enlarging the strategy-as-practice research agenda: Towards taller and flatter ontologies. Organization Studies, 35(10), 1407-1421. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840614541886
Shepherd, D. A., & Suddaby, R. (2017). Theory building: A review and integration. Journal of Management, 43(1), 59–86. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316647102
Snow, D. A., Morrill, C., & Anderson, L. (2003). Elaborating analytic ethnography: Linking fieldwork and theory. Ethnography, 4(2), 181–200. https://doi.org/10.1177/14661381030042002.
Soin, K., & Scheytt, T. (2006). Making the case for narrative methods in cross-cultural organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 9(1), 55-77. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428105283297
Sorsa, V., & Vaara, E. (2020). How can pluralistic organizations proceed with strategic change? a processual account of rhetorical contestation, convergence, and partial agreement in a nordic city organization. Organization Science, online first, 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2019.1332
Spradley, J. P. (1979). The ethnographic interview. Belmont: Wadsworth Group & Thomson Learning.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.
Suddaby, R. (2006). What grounded theory is not. Academy of Management Journal, 49(4), 633–642. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2006.22083020
Suddaby, R., Seidl, D., & Lê, J. K. (2013). Strategy-as-practice meets neo- institutional theory. Strategic Organization, 11(3), 329-344. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127013497618
Tsoukas, H. (2010). Practice, strategy making and intentionality: A Heideggerian onto-epistemology for Strategy as Practice. In D. Golsorkhi, L. Rouleau, D. Seidl, & E. Vaara. (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of strategy as practice (pp. 47-62). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tsoukas, H. (2018). Strategy and virtue: Developing strategy-as-practice through virtue ethics. Strategic Organization, 16(3) 323–351. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127017733142
Vaara E., Sonenshein, S., & Boje, D. (2016). Narratives as sources of stability and change in organizations: approaches and directions for future research. Academy of Management Annals, 10(1), 495-560. https://doi.org/10.1080/19416520.2016.1120963
Vaara, E., & Whittington, R. (2012). Strategy-as-practice: Taking social practices seriously. The Academy of Management Annals, 6(1), 285-336. https://doi.org/10.1080/19416520.2012.672039
Van Manen, M. (1984). Practicing phenomenological writing. Phenomenology + Pedagogy, 2(1), 36-69. https://doi.org/10.29173/pandp14931
Van Maanen, J. (1988). Tales of the field: On writing ethnography. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Van Maanen, J., Sørensen, J. B., & Mitchell, T. R. (2007). The interplay between theory and method. Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1145–1154. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.26586080
Vesa, M., & Vaara, E. (2014). Strategic ethnography 2.0: Four methods for advancing strategy process and practice research. Strategic Organization, 12(4), 288–298. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127014554745
Vom Lehn, D., & Hitzler, R. (2015). Phenomenology-based ethnography: Introduction to the special issue. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 44(5), 539–543. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891241615595436
Walsh, I., Holton, J. A., Bailyn, L., Fernandez, W., Levina, N., & Glaser, B. (2015). What grounded theory is… A critically reflective conversation among scholars. Organizational Research Methods, 18(4), 581-599. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114565028
Watson, T. J. (2011). Ethnography, reality, and truth: The vital need for studies of ‘how things work’ in organizations and management. Journal of Management Studies, 48(1), 202-217. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2010.00979.x
Watson, T. J., & Watson, D. H. (2012). Narratives in society, organizations and individual identities: An ethnographic study of pubs, identity work and the pursuit of ‘the real’. Human Relations, 65(6), 683–704. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726712440586
Whittle, A., Gilchrist, A., Mueller, F., & Lenney, P. (2020). The art of stage-craft: A dramaturgical perspective on strategic change. Strategic Organization, online first, 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127020914225
Whittington, R. (2004). Estratégia após o modernismo: recuperando a prática. Revita de Administração de Empresas, 44(4), 44-53.
Whittington, R. (1996). Strategy as practice. Long Range Planning, 29(5), 731-735. https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-6301(96)00068-4
Whittington, R. (2006). Completing the practice turn in strategy research. Organization Studies, 27(5), 613-634. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840606064101
Whittington, R. (2010). Giddens, structuration theory and Strategy as Practice. In D. Golsorkhi, L. Rouleau, D. Seidl, & E. Vaara (Eds.). Cambridge handbook of strategy as practice (pp. 109-126). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Whittington, R. (2011). The practice turn in organization research: towards a disciplined transdisciplinarity. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 36, 183–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2011.04.003
Whittington, R., Cailluet, L., & Yakis-Douglas, B. (2011). Opening strategy: Evolution of a precarious profession. British Journal of Management, 22(3), 531–544. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2011.00762.x
Willems, T. (2018). Seeing and sensing the railways: A phenomenological view on practice-based learning. Management Learning, 49(1), 23–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350507617725188
Wolf, C., & Floyd, S. W. (2017). Strategic planning research: Toward a theory-driven agenda. Journal of Management, 43(6), 1754-1788. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206313478185