Decision-Making Quality of Public Managers: Contributions from Intelligence and Knowledge Management
Open Data
Main Article Content
Claudia Melati
Raquel Janissek-Muniz
Carla Maria Marques Curado
Abstract
Context: in recent years, studies have sought to analyze how intelligence and knowledge management processes are understood and applied in the context of public management, environments in which processes appear as a point to be explored to enhance decision-making quality. Objective: to analyze how public managers apply intelligence and knowledge management aiming at a higher decision quality. Method: based on a defined and validated research protocol, interviews were conducted with seventeen public managers in southern Brazil. For the analysis, the qualitative comparative analysis technique using fuzzy sets was applied. Results: the results suggest the importance of effective data, information, and knowledge management for the decision-making quality of public managers, demonstrating that the absence of decision-making quality is directly related to the absence or little use of knowledge management and intelligence elements in the public management. Conclusion: in addition to analyzing conditions and proposing ways to lead to greater quality in decision making by public managers, it was possible to contribute to the theme of knowledge management and intelligence in public management, as well as to benefit the government with paths to be consolidated and better explored.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Download data is not yet available.
Article Details
How to Cite
Melati, C., Janissek-Muniz, R., & Curado, C. M. M. (2020). Decision-Making Quality of Public Managers: Contributions from Intelligence and Knowledge Management. Journal of Contemporary Administration, 25(2), e190044. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-7849rac2021190044.en
Section
Articles
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Since mid-February of 2023, the authors retain the copyright relating to their article and grant the journal RAC, from ANPAD, the right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (CC BY 4.0), as stated in the article’s PDF document. This license provides that the article published can be shared (allows you to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format) and adapted (allows you to remix, transform, and create from the material for any purpose, even commercial) by anyone.
After article acceptance, the authors must sign a Term of Authorization for Publication, which is sent to the authors by e-mail for electronic signature before publication.
References
Abrucio, F. L. (1997). O impacto do modelo gerencial na administração pública: um breve estudo sobre a experiência internacional recente. Brasília, DF: ENAP. Retrieved from https://repositorio.enap.gov.br/bitstream/1/556/1/O%20impacto%20do%20modelo%20gerencial%20na%20Administra%c3%a7%c3%a3o%20P%c3%bablica.pdf
Alavi, M., & Leidner, D. E. (2001). Knowledge management and knowledge management systems: Conceptual foundations and research issues. MIS Quarterly, 25(1), 107-136. https://doi.org/10.2307/3250961
Alhamoudi, S. (2015). Knowledge Management Strategies in Public Sector—Case Study. China-USA Business Review, 14(3), 159-170. http://doi.org/10.17265/1537-1514/2015.03.004
Andriotti, F. K., Freitas, H., & Janissek-Muniz, R. (2008). Informação informal e a monitoração do ambiente organizacional: reflexões e sugestões para a área de TI. III Prêmio de INovação em Inteligência Competitiva. Congresso Ibero Americano de Gestão do Conhecimento e Inteligência Competitiva, Brasília, DF. Brazil. 2.
Arora, E. (2011). Knowledge management in public sector. Researchers World, 2(1), 165. Retrieved from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.474.3542&rep=rep1&type=pdf
Bardin, L. (2011). Análise de conteúdo. Lisboa: Edições, 70.
Batista, F. F. (2012). Modelo de gestão do conhecimento para a administração pública brasileira: como implementar a gestão do conhecimento para produzir resultados em benefício do cidadão. Brasília, DF: Ipea, 2012. Retrieved from https://www.ipea.gov.br/portal/images/stories/PDFs/livros/livros/livro_modelodegestao_vol01.pdf
Benedetti, F., & Janissek-Muniz, R. (2009). Knowledge management: an important resource for the strategic intelligence. Anais do CONTECSI - International Conference on Information Systems and Technology Management, São Paulo, SP, Brazil, 6.
Bernardes, M. B., Andrade, F. P. de, Novais, P., & Lopes, N. V. (2017). Reference model and method of evaluation for smart cities in government portals: a study of the Portuguese and Brazilian reality. Proceedings of the International Conference on Electronic Governance and Open Society: Challenges in Eurasia. ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3129757.3129781
Bryman, A., & Bell, E. (2003). Business Research Methods. Hong Kong: Oxford University Press.
Capobiango, R. P., Nascimento, A. D. L. do, Silva, E. A., & Faroni, W. (2013). Reformas administrativas no Brasil: Uma abordagem teórica e crítica. REGE Revista de Gestão, 20(1), 61-78. https://doi.org/10.5700/rege487
Cavalcante, P. (2018). Innovations in the Federal Government during the post-new public management era. Revista de Administração Contemporânea, 22(6), 885-902. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-7849rac2018170391
Cepik, M. A. (1997). Inteligência, política e poder no Estado contemporâneo. Revista de Sociologia e Política, (9), 193-196. Retrieved from http://professor.ufrgs.br/marcocepik/publications/inteligencia-politica-e-poder-no-estado-contemporaneo-resenha
Cepik, M. (2005). Regime político e sistema de inteligência no Brasil: legitimidade e efetividade como desafios institucionais. Dados, 48(1), 67-113. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0011-52582005000100004
Davenport, T. H. (1997). Ten principles of knowledge management and four case studies. Knowledge and process Management, 4(3), 187-208. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1441(199709)4:3<187::AID-KPM99>3.0.CO;2-A
Davenport, T. H. (1998). Ecologia da informação: Porque só a tecnologia não basta para o sucesso na era da informação. São Paulo: Futura.
Dawes, S. S., Cresswell, A. M., & Pardo, T. A. (2009). From “need to know” to “need to share”: Tangled problems, information boundaries, and the building of public sector knowledge networks. Public Administration Review, 69(3), 392-402. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2009.01987_2.x
Desouza, K. C. (2005). Restructuring government intelligence programs: A few good suggestions. Government Information Quarterly, 22(3), 342-353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2005.05.001
Duriau, V. J., Reger, R. K., & Pfarrer, M. D. (2007). A content analysis of the content analysis literature in organization studies: research themes, data sources, and methodological refinements. Organizational Research Methods. 10(1), 5–34. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428106289252
Eom, S. J., Choi, N., & Sung, W. (2016). The use of smart work in government: Empirical analysis of Korean experiences. Government Information Quarterly, 33(3), 562-571. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2016.01.005
Fachinelli, A. C., Glacomello, C. P., Rech, J., & Bertolini, A. L. (2013). Inteligência estratégica: desenvolvimento de uma escala para compreensão do construto. Revista Brasileira de Estratégia, 6(2), 179-191. https://doi.org/10.7213/rebrae.06.002.AO06
Finfgeld-Connett, D. (2014). Use of content analysis to conduct knowledge-building and theory-generating qualitative systematic reviews. Qualitative Research, 14(3), 341–352. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794113481790
Fiss, P.C. (2007). A set-theoretic approach to organizational configurations. Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1180-1198. Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/901b/357c7d4ab59298bd0872554f3f34091c40ff.pdf
Fiss, P. C. (2011). Building better causal theories: A fuzzy set approach to typologies in organization research. Academy of Management Journal, 54(2), 393-420. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.60263120
Fiss, P. C., Sharapov, D., & Cronqvist, L. (2013). Opposites attract? Opportunities and challenges for integrating large-N QCA and econometric analysis. Political Research Quarterly, 66(1), 191-198. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912912468269e
Gaspar, M. A., Santos, S. A. dos, Donaire, D., Kuniyoshi, M. S., & Prearo, L. C. (2016). Gestão do conhecimento em empresas atuantes na indústria de software no Brasil: um estudo das práticas e ferramentas utilizadas. Informação & Sociedade, 26(1), 151-166. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11959/brapci/91930
Gil-Garcia, J. R., Pardo, T. A., & Aldama-Nalda, A. (2013). Smart cities and smart governments: Using information technologies to address urban challenges. Proceedings of the 14th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research. https://doi.org/10.1145/2479724.2479728
Gil-Garcia, J. R., Helbig, N., & Ojo, A. (2014). Being smart: Emerging technologies and innovation in the public sector. Government Information Quarterly, 31, I1-I8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2014.09.001
Gil-Garcia, J. R., Zhang, J., & Puron-Cid, G. (2016). Conceptualizing smartness in government: An integrative and multi-dimensional view. Government Information Quarterly, 33(3), 524-534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2016.03.002
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
Gold, A. H., Malhotra, A., & Segars, A. H. (2001). Knowledge management: An organizational capabilities perspective. Journal of management information systems, 18(1), 185-214. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/220591588_Knowledge_Management_An_Organizational_Capabilities_Perspective/link/09e4150b6486954612000000/download
Guba, E. & Lincoln, Y. (2005). Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions and emerging confluences. In E. Guba, and Y. Lincoln. (Eds.). The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research (pp. 191-215). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Hazlett, S., McAdam, R., & Beggs, V. (2008). An exploratory study of knowledge flows: A case study of Public Sector Procurement. Total Quality Management, 19(1-2). https://doi.org/10.1080/14783360701602205
Jain, A. K., & Jeppesen, H. J. (2013). Knowledge management practices in a public sector organization: The role of leaders’ cognitive styles. Journal of Knowledge Management, 17(3), 347-362. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-11-2012-0358
Janissek-Muniz, R., & Blanck, M. R. M. (2014). Weak signals management, entrepreneurship and uncertainty: A relational theoretical essay under the perspective of intelligence. Anais do CONTECSI - International Conference on Information Systems and Technology Management. São Paulo, SP, Brazil, 11. https://doi.org/10.5748/9788599693100-11CONTECSI/COMM-625
Janissek-Muniz, R., Lesca, H., & Freitas, H. (2006). Inteligência estratégica antecipativa e coletiva para tomada de decisão. Revista Organizações em Contexto, 2(4), 92-118. Retrieved from http://www.ufrgs.br/gianti/files/artigos/2007/2007_organizacao_em_contexto_rjm_hl_hf_inteligencia_antecipativa_coletiva.pdf
Johnston, E. W., & Hansen, D. L. (2011). Design lessons for smart governance infrastructures. In A. P. Balutis, D. Ink. Transforming American Governance: Rebooting the public square (pp. 197-212). London: Routledge.
Klering, L. R., Porsse, M. C. S., & Guadagnin, L. A. (2010). Novos Caminhos da Administração Pública Brasileira. Análise, 21(1), 4-17. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/277097960_Novos_Caminhos_da_Administracao_Publica_Brasileira
Linders, D., Liao, C. Z. P., & Wang, C. M. (2015). Proactive e-Governance: Flipping the service delivery model from pull to push in Taiwan. Government Information Quarterly, 35(Supl 4), 68-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2015.08.004
Lindner, F., & Wald, A. (2011). Success factors of knowledge management in temporary organizations. International Journal of Project Management, 29(7), 877-888. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2010.09.003
Liu, X., & Zheng, L. (2015). Cross-departmental collaboration in one-stop service center for smart governance in China: Factors, strategies and effectiveness. Government Information Quarterly, 35(Supl4), 54-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2015.12.001
McBride, K., Aavik, G., Kalvet, T., & Krimmer, R. (2018). Co-creating an open government data driven public service: The case of Chicago’s Food inspection forecasting model. https://doi.org/10.24251/HICSS.2018.309
Malomo, F., & Sena, V. (2017). Data intelligence for local government? Assessing the benefits and barriers to use of big data in the public sector. Policy & Internet, 9(1), 7-27. https://doi.org/10.1002/poi3.141
Mao, H., Liu, S., Zhang, J., & Deng, Z. (2016). Information technology resource, knowledge management capability, and competitive advantage: The moderating role of resource commitment. International Journal of Information Management, 36(6), 1062-1074. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2016.07.001
Ministério do Planejamento. (2016). Orçamento e Gestão. Programa GESPÚBLICA, Instrumento para Avaliação da Gestão Pública-250 Pontos. Brasília, DF: Secretaria de Gestão Pública, 2015. Versão 1/2016. Retrieved from http://www.gespublica.gov.br/sites/default/files/documentos/gagp-250_pontos_novo.pdf
Monavvarian, A., & Kasaei, M. (2007). A KM model for public administration: The case of Labour Ministry. Vine, 37(3), 348-367. https://doi.org/10.1108/03055720710825654
Myers, M. D. (2013). Qualitative research in business and management. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Nonaka, I. (1994). A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization Sscience, 5(1), 14-37. Retrieved from www.jstor.org/stable/2635068
Nonaka, I., & Konno, N. (1998). The concept of “Ba”: Building a foundation for knowledge creation. California Management Review, 40(3), 40-54. Retrieved from http://home.business.utah.edu/actme/7410/Nonaka%201998.pdf
Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (2008). Teoria da criação do conhecimento organizacional. In I. Nonaka, H. Takeuchi. Gestão do conhecimento (pp. 54-90). Porto Alegre: Bookman.
Paula, G., de, & Rover, A. J. (2012). O governo eletrônico e a atividade de inteligência. Revista Democracia Digital e Governo Eletrônico, 1(6) 216-237. Retrieved from http://buscalegis.ufsc.br/revistas/index.php/observatoriodoegov/article/view/89
Paula, A. P. P., de. (2005). Administração pública brasileira entre o gerencialismo e a gestão social. Revista de Administração de Empresas, 45(1), 36-49. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0034-75902005000100005
Pee, L. G., & Kankanhalli, A. (2016). Interactions among factors influencing knowledge management in public-sector organizations: A resource-based view. Government Information Quarterly, 33(1), 188-199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2015.06.002
Pereira, L.C.B. (1996). Da administração pública burocrática à gerencial. Revista do Serviço Público, 47(1), 1-28. https://doi.org/10.21874/rsp.v47i1.702
Przeybilovicz, E., Cunha, M.A., Macaya, J. F. M., & Albuquerque, J. P. D. (2018 January). A Tale of two “Smart Cities”: Investigating the echoes of new public management and governance discourses in Smart City Projects in Brazil. Proceedings of the Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Honolulu, HI, USA, 51.
Ragin, C. C. (2000). Fuzzy-set social science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Ragin, C. C. (2005). From fuzzy sets to crisp truth tables. Retrieved from http://compasss.org/wpseries/Ragin2004.pdf
Ragin, C. C. (2008). Redesigning social inquiry: Fuzzy sets and beyond. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226702797.001.0001
Rezende, D. A., & Frey, K. (2005). Administração estratégica e governança eletrônica na gestão urbana. Revista Eletrônica de Gestão de Negócios, 1(1), 51-59. Retrieved from https://www.unisantos.br/mestrado/gestao/egesta/artigos/24.pdf
Rezende, D. A. (2012). Projeto de Organizational Business Intelligence (OBI): modelo organizacional de três organizações paranaenses. Anais do CONTECSI - Congresso Internacional de Gestão da Tecnologia e Sistemas de Informação, São Paulo, SP, Brazil, 9.
Ribeiro, L. M. D. P., Pereira, J. R., & Benedicto, G. C. D. (2013). As reformas da administração pública brasileira: Uma contextualização do seu cenário, dos entraves e das novas perspectivas. Anais EnANPAD, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil, 37.
Riege, A., & Lindsay, N. (2006). Knowledge management in the public sector: stakeholder partnerships in the public policy development. Journal of knowledge management, 10(3), 24-39. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270610670830
Rihoux, B. & Ragin, C. C. (2009). Configurational comparative methods. Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and related techniques. https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781452226569
Rios, F. D. C., Strauss, L. M., Janissek-Muniz, R., & Brodbeck, A. G. (2011). Inteligência competitiva, empresarial, estratégica ou de negócios? Um olhar a partir da Administração de Empresas. Facef Pesquisa, 14(2), 225-238. Retrieved from http://periodicos.unifacef.com.br/index.php/facefpesquisa/article/view/278/269
Schedler, K., Guenduez, A.A., & Frischknecht, R. (2019). How smart can government be? Exploring barriers to the adoption of smart government. Information Polity, 24(1), 3-20. https://doi.org/10.3233/IP-180095
Scholl, H. J., & Scholl, M. C. (2014). Smart governance: A roadmap for research and practice. iConference 2014 Proceedings, Illinois, CH, USA. https://doi.org/10.9776/14060
Schutte, N., & Barkhuizen, N. (2015). Knowledge management and sharing in local government: A social identity theory perspective. Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management, 13(2), 131-142. Retrieved from http://www.ejkm.com/volume13/issue2
Secchi, L. (2009). Modelos organizacionais e reformas da administração pública. Revista de Administração Pública, 43(2), 347-369. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-76122009000200004
Shinoda, A. C. M., Maximiano, A. C. A., & Sbragia, R. (2015). Gestão do conhecimento em organizações orientadas para projetos. Gestão e Projetos: GeP, 6(1), 95-110. http://doi.org/10.5585/gep.v6i1.111
Terra, J. C. C., & Almeida, C. (2008). Gestão do Conhecimento e Inteligência Competitiva: duas faces da mesma moeda. Terra Fórum Associados. Retrieved from http://docplayer.com.br/84936701-Gestao-do-conhecimento-e-inteligencia-competitiva-duas-faces-da-mesma-moeda.html
Tzortzaki, A. M., & Mihiotis, A. (2014). A review of knowledge management theory and future directions. Knowledge and Process Management, 21(1), 29-41. https://doi.org/10.1002/kpm.1429
Valle-Cruz, D., & Sandoval-Almazan, R. (2018, May). Towards an understanding of artificial intelligence in government. Proceedings of the Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research: Governance in the Data Age, Delft, Netherlands, 19. https://doi.org/10.1145/3209281.3209397
Voronchuk, I., & Starineca, O. (2014). Knowledge management and possibilities of professional development in public sector. European Integration Studies, (8), 168-179. https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.eis.0.8.6844
Weber, R. P. (1990). Quantitative applications in the social sciences: basic content analysis, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Welsh, W (2014, June 5). Smart Government: All about disruption. Information Week. https://www.informationweek.com/government/open-government/smart-government-all-about-disruption/d/d-id/1269459
Wiig, K. M. (1997). Knowledge management: Where did it come from and where will it go? Expert Systems With Applications, 13(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0957-4174(97)00018-3
Wiig, K. M. (2002). Knowledge management in public administration. Journal of Knowledge Management, 6(3), 224-239. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270210434331
Alavi, M., & Leidner, D. E. (2001). Knowledge management and knowledge management systems: Conceptual foundations and research issues. MIS Quarterly, 25(1), 107-136. https://doi.org/10.2307/3250961
Alhamoudi, S. (2015). Knowledge Management Strategies in Public Sector—Case Study. China-USA Business Review, 14(3), 159-170. http://doi.org/10.17265/1537-1514/2015.03.004
Andriotti, F. K., Freitas, H., & Janissek-Muniz, R. (2008). Informação informal e a monitoração do ambiente organizacional: reflexões e sugestões para a área de TI. III Prêmio de INovação em Inteligência Competitiva. Congresso Ibero Americano de Gestão do Conhecimento e Inteligência Competitiva, Brasília, DF. Brazil. 2.
Arora, E. (2011). Knowledge management in public sector. Researchers World, 2(1), 165. Retrieved from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.474.3542&rep=rep1&type=pdf
Bardin, L. (2011). Análise de conteúdo. Lisboa: Edições, 70.
Batista, F. F. (2012). Modelo de gestão do conhecimento para a administração pública brasileira: como implementar a gestão do conhecimento para produzir resultados em benefício do cidadão. Brasília, DF: Ipea, 2012. Retrieved from https://www.ipea.gov.br/portal/images/stories/PDFs/livros/livros/livro_modelodegestao_vol01.pdf
Benedetti, F., & Janissek-Muniz, R. (2009). Knowledge management: an important resource for the strategic intelligence. Anais do CONTECSI - International Conference on Information Systems and Technology Management, São Paulo, SP, Brazil, 6.
Bernardes, M. B., Andrade, F. P. de, Novais, P., & Lopes, N. V. (2017). Reference model and method of evaluation for smart cities in government portals: a study of the Portuguese and Brazilian reality. Proceedings of the International Conference on Electronic Governance and Open Society: Challenges in Eurasia. ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3129757.3129781
Bryman, A., & Bell, E. (2003). Business Research Methods. Hong Kong: Oxford University Press.
Capobiango, R. P., Nascimento, A. D. L. do, Silva, E. A., & Faroni, W. (2013). Reformas administrativas no Brasil: Uma abordagem teórica e crítica. REGE Revista de Gestão, 20(1), 61-78. https://doi.org/10.5700/rege487
Cavalcante, P. (2018). Innovations in the Federal Government during the post-new public management era. Revista de Administração Contemporânea, 22(6), 885-902. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-7849rac2018170391
Cepik, M. A. (1997). Inteligência, política e poder no Estado contemporâneo. Revista de Sociologia e Política, (9), 193-196. Retrieved from http://professor.ufrgs.br/marcocepik/publications/inteligencia-politica-e-poder-no-estado-contemporaneo-resenha
Cepik, M. (2005). Regime político e sistema de inteligência no Brasil: legitimidade e efetividade como desafios institucionais. Dados, 48(1), 67-113. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0011-52582005000100004
Davenport, T. H. (1997). Ten principles of knowledge management and four case studies. Knowledge and process Management, 4(3), 187-208. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1441(199709)4:3<187::AID-KPM99>3.0.CO;2-A
Davenport, T. H. (1998). Ecologia da informação: Porque só a tecnologia não basta para o sucesso na era da informação. São Paulo: Futura.
Dawes, S. S., Cresswell, A. M., & Pardo, T. A. (2009). From “need to know” to “need to share”: Tangled problems, information boundaries, and the building of public sector knowledge networks. Public Administration Review, 69(3), 392-402. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2009.01987_2.x
Desouza, K. C. (2005). Restructuring government intelligence programs: A few good suggestions. Government Information Quarterly, 22(3), 342-353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2005.05.001
Duriau, V. J., Reger, R. K., & Pfarrer, M. D. (2007). A content analysis of the content analysis literature in organization studies: research themes, data sources, and methodological refinements. Organizational Research Methods. 10(1), 5–34. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428106289252
Eom, S. J., Choi, N., & Sung, W. (2016). The use of smart work in government: Empirical analysis of Korean experiences. Government Information Quarterly, 33(3), 562-571. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2016.01.005
Fachinelli, A. C., Glacomello, C. P., Rech, J., & Bertolini, A. L. (2013). Inteligência estratégica: desenvolvimento de uma escala para compreensão do construto. Revista Brasileira de Estratégia, 6(2), 179-191. https://doi.org/10.7213/rebrae.06.002.AO06
Finfgeld-Connett, D. (2014). Use of content analysis to conduct knowledge-building and theory-generating qualitative systematic reviews. Qualitative Research, 14(3), 341–352. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794113481790
Fiss, P.C. (2007). A set-theoretic approach to organizational configurations. Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1180-1198. Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/901b/357c7d4ab59298bd0872554f3f34091c40ff.pdf
Fiss, P. C. (2011). Building better causal theories: A fuzzy set approach to typologies in organization research. Academy of Management Journal, 54(2), 393-420. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.60263120
Fiss, P. C., Sharapov, D., & Cronqvist, L. (2013). Opposites attract? Opportunities and challenges for integrating large-N QCA and econometric analysis. Political Research Quarterly, 66(1), 191-198. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912912468269e
Gaspar, M. A., Santos, S. A. dos, Donaire, D., Kuniyoshi, M. S., & Prearo, L. C. (2016). Gestão do conhecimento em empresas atuantes na indústria de software no Brasil: um estudo das práticas e ferramentas utilizadas. Informação & Sociedade, 26(1), 151-166. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11959/brapci/91930
Gil-Garcia, J. R., Pardo, T. A., & Aldama-Nalda, A. (2013). Smart cities and smart governments: Using information technologies to address urban challenges. Proceedings of the 14th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research. https://doi.org/10.1145/2479724.2479728
Gil-Garcia, J. R., Helbig, N., & Ojo, A. (2014). Being smart: Emerging technologies and innovation in the public sector. Government Information Quarterly, 31, I1-I8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2014.09.001
Gil-Garcia, J. R., Zhang, J., & Puron-Cid, G. (2016). Conceptualizing smartness in government: An integrative and multi-dimensional view. Government Information Quarterly, 33(3), 524-534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2016.03.002
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
Gold, A. H., Malhotra, A., & Segars, A. H. (2001). Knowledge management: An organizational capabilities perspective. Journal of management information systems, 18(1), 185-214. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/220591588_Knowledge_Management_An_Organizational_Capabilities_Perspective/link/09e4150b6486954612000000/download
Guba, E. & Lincoln, Y. (2005). Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions and emerging confluences. In E. Guba, and Y. Lincoln. (Eds.). The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research (pp. 191-215). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Hazlett, S., McAdam, R., & Beggs, V. (2008). An exploratory study of knowledge flows: A case study of Public Sector Procurement. Total Quality Management, 19(1-2). https://doi.org/10.1080/14783360701602205
Jain, A. K., & Jeppesen, H. J. (2013). Knowledge management practices in a public sector organization: The role of leaders’ cognitive styles. Journal of Knowledge Management, 17(3), 347-362. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-11-2012-0358
Janissek-Muniz, R., & Blanck, M. R. M. (2014). Weak signals management, entrepreneurship and uncertainty: A relational theoretical essay under the perspective of intelligence. Anais do CONTECSI - International Conference on Information Systems and Technology Management. São Paulo, SP, Brazil, 11. https://doi.org/10.5748/9788599693100-11CONTECSI/COMM-625
Janissek-Muniz, R., Lesca, H., & Freitas, H. (2006). Inteligência estratégica antecipativa e coletiva para tomada de decisão. Revista Organizações em Contexto, 2(4), 92-118. Retrieved from http://www.ufrgs.br/gianti/files/artigos/2007/2007_organizacao_em_contexto_rjm_hl_hf_inteligencia_antecipativa_coletiva.pdf
Johnston, E. W., & Hansen, D. L. (2011). Design lessons for smart governance infrastructures. In A. P. Balutis, D. Ink. Transforming American Governance: Rebooting the public square (pp. 197-212). London: Routledge.
Klering, L. R., Porsse, M. C. S., & Guadagnin, L. A. (2010). Novos Caminhos da Administração Pública Brasileira. Análise, 21(1), 4-17. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/277097960_Novos_Caminhos_da_Administracao_Publica_Brasileira
Linders, D., Liao, C. Z. P., & Wang, C. M. (2015). Proactive e-Governance: Flipping the service delivery model from pull to push in Taiwan. Government Information Quarterly, 35(Supl 4), 68-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2015.08.004
Lindner, F., & Wald, A. (2011). Success factors of knowledge management in temporary organizations. International Journal of Project Management, 29(7), 877-888. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2010.09.003
Liu, X., & Zheng, L. (2015). Cross-departmental collaboration in one-stop service center for smart governance in China: Factors, strategies and effectiveness. Government Information Quarterly, 35(Supl4), 54-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2015.12.001
McBride, K., Aavik, G., Kalvet, T., & Krimmer, R. (2018). Co-creating an open government data driven public service: The case of Chicago’s Food inspection forecasting model. https://doi.org/10.24251/HICSS.2018.309
Malomo, F., & Sena, V. (2017). Data intelligence for local government? Assessing the benefits and barriers to use of big data in the public sector. Policy & Internet, 9(1), 7-27. https://doi.org/10.1002/poi3.141
Mao, H., Liu, S., Zhang, J., & Deng, Z. (2016). Information technology resource, knowledge management capability, and competitive advantage: The moderating role of resource commitment. International Journal of Information Management, 36(6), 1062-1074. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2016.07.001
Ministério do Planejamento. (2016). Orçamento e Gestão. Programa GESPÚBLICA, Instrumento para Avaliação da Gestão Pública-250 Pontos. Brasília, DF: Secretaria de Gestão Pública, 2015. Versão 1/2016. Retrieved from http://www.gespublica.gov.br/sites/default/files/documentos/gagp-250_pontos_novo.pdf
Monavvarian, A., & Kasaei, M. (2007). A KM model for public administration: The case of Labour Ministry. Vine, 37(3), 348-367. https://doi.org/10.1108/03055720710825654
Myers, M. D. (2013). Qualitative research in business and management. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Nonaka, I. (1994). A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization Sscience, 5(1), 14-37. Retrieved from www.jstor.org/stable/2635068
Nonaka, I., & Konno, N. (1998). The concept of “Ba”: Building a foundation for knowledge creation. California Management Review, 40(3), 40-54. Retrieved from http://home.business.utah.edu/actme/7410/Nonaka%201998.pdf
Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (2008). Teoria da criação do conhecimento organizacional. In I. Nonaka, H. Takeuchi. Gestão do conhecimento (pp. 54-90). Porto Alegre: Bookman.
Paula, G., de, & Rover, A. J. (2012). O governo eletrônico e a atividade de inteligência. Revista Democracia Digital e Governo Eletrônico, 1(6) 216-237. Retrieved from http://buscalegis.ufsc.br/revistas/index.php/observatoriodoegov/article/view/89
Paula, A. P. P., de. (2005). Administração pública brasileira entre o gerencialismo e a gestão social. Revista de Administração de Empresas, 45(1), 36-49. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0034-75902005000100005
Pee, L. G., & Kankanhalli, A. (2016). Interactions among factors influencing knowledge management in public-sector organizations: A resource-based view. Government Information Quarterly, 33(1), 188-199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2015.06.002
Pereira, L.C.B. (1996). Da administração pública burocrática à gerencial. Revista do Serviço Público, 47(1), 1-28. https://doi.org/10.21874/rsp.v47i1.702
Przeybilovicz, E., Cunha, M.A., Macaya, J. F. M., & Albuquerque, J. P. D. (2018 January). A Tale of two “Smart Cities”: Investigating the echoes of new public management and governance discourses in Smart City Projects in Brazil. Proceedings of the Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Honolulu, HI, USA, 51.
Ragin, C. C. (2000). Fuzzy-set social science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Ragin, C. C. (2005). From fuzzy sets to crisp truth tables. Retrieved from http://compasss.org/wpseries/Ragin2004.pdf
Ragin, C. C. (2008). Redesigning social inquiry: Fuzzy sets and beyond. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226702797.001.0001
Rezende, D. A., & Frey, K. (2005). Administração estratégica e governança eletrônica na gestão urbana. Revista Eletrônica de Gestão de Negócios, 1(1), 51-59. Retrieved from https://www.unisantos.br/mestrado/gestao/egesta/artigos/24.pdf
Rezende, D. A. (2012). Projeto de Organizational Business Intelligence (OBI): modelo organizacional de três organizações paranaenses. Anais do CONTECSI - Congresso Internacional de Gestão da Tecnologia e Sistemas de Informação, São Paulo, SP, Brazil, 9.
Ribeiro, L. M. D. P., Pereira, J. R., & Benedicto, G. C. D. (2013). As reformas da administração pública brasileira: Uma contextualização do seu cenário, dos entraves e das novas perspectivas. Anais EnANPAD, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil, 37.
Riege, A., & Lindsay, N. (2006). Knowledge management in the public sector: stakeholder partnerships in the public policy development. Journal of knowledge management, 10(3), 24-39. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270610670830
Rihoux, B. & Ragin, C. C. (2009). Configurational comparative methods. Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and related techniques. https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781452226569
Rios, F. D. C., Strauss, L. M., Janissek-Muniz, R., & Brodbeck, A. G. (2011). Inteligência competitiva, empresarial, estratégica ou de negócios? Um olhar a partir da Administração de Empresas. Facef Pesquisa, 14(2), 225-238. Retrieved from http://periodicos.unifacef.com.br/index.php/facefpesquisa/article/view/278/269
Schedler, K., Guenduez, A.A., & Frischknecht, R. (2019). How smart can government be? Exploring barriers to the adoption of smart government. Information Polity, 24(1), 3-20. https://doi.org/10.3233/IP-180095
Scholl, H. J., & Scholl, M. C. (2014). Smart governance: A roadmap for research and practice. iConference 2014 Proceedings, Illinois, CH, USA. https://doi.org/10.9776/14060
Schutte, N., & Barkhuizen, N. (2015). Knowledge management and sharing in local government: A social identity theory perspective. Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management, 13(2), 131-142. Retrieved from http://www.ejkm.com/volume13/issue2
Secchi, L. (2009). Modelos organizacionais e reformas da administração pública. Revista de Administração Pública, 43(2), 347-369. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-76122009000200004
Shinoda, A. C. M., Maximiano, A. C. A., & Sbragia, R. (2015). Gestão do conhecimento em organizações orientadas para projetos. Gestão e Projetos: GeP, 6(1), 95-110. http://doi.org/10.5585/gep.v6i1.111
Terra, J. C. C., & Almeida, C. (2008). Gestão do Conhecimento e Inteligência Competitiva: duas faces da mesma moeda. Terra Fórum Associados. Retrieved from http://docplayer.com.br/84936701-Gestao-do-conhecimento-e-inteligencia-competitiva-duas-faces-da-mesma-moeda.html
Tzortzaki, A. M., & Mihiotis, A. (2014). A review of knowledge management theory and future directions. Knowledge and Process Management, 21(1), 29-41. https://doi.org/10.1002/kpm.1429
Valle-Cruz, D., & Sandoval-Almazan, R. (2018, May). Towards an understanding of artificial intelligence in government. Proceedings of the Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research: Governance in the Data Age, Delft, Netherlands, 19. https://doi.org/10.1145/3209281.3209397
Voronchuk, I., & Starineca, O. (2014). Knowledge management and possibilities of professional development in public sector. European Integration Studies, (8), 168-179. https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.eis.0.8.6844
Weber, R. P. (1990). Quantitative applications in the social sciences: basic content analysis, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Welsh, W (2014, June 5). Smart Government: All about disruption. Information Week. https://www.informationweek.com/government/open-government/smart-government-all-about-disruption/d/d-id/1269459
Wiig, K. M. (1997). Knowledge management: Where did it come from and where will it go? Expert Systems With Applications, 13(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0957-4174(97)00018-3
Wiig, K. M. (2002). Knowledge management in public administration. Journal of Knowledge Management, 6(3), 224-239. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270210434331