Environmental Governance that Emerges from Action: Pragmatist Studies in Protected Areas
Main Article Content
Abstract
Objective: the main objectives of this work are to contribute to reducing the gap in studies on the management of protected areas in the field of administration, and to understand how environmental governance is performed in action. Theoretical approach: the theoretical basis was composed of approaches to environmental governance, pragmatistinspired sociologies, and pragmatist analysis of organizations. Methods: the research strategy adopted the general premises of ethnography in organizational studies, with daily in situ monitoring of the situations experienced by the actors in the organizations and their interactions with the other actors in their environment. In-depth interviews, bibliographical research, and document analysis were also carried out. Results: the results of the research primarily indicate that the environmental governance that emerged from the action in the two protected areas is a process characterized by conflicts, controversies, and contradictions. Conclusion: environmental governance can be characterized as processes of creating shared governance and management mechanisms, establishing institutional arrangements and partnerships, building territorial assets, and monitoring actions. What stands out in all these processes is the cross-cutting nature of managing conflicts, controversies, and confronting contradictions.
Download data is not yet available.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Since mid-February of 2023, the authors retain the copyright relating to their article and grant the journal RAC, from ANPAD, the right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (CC BY 4.0), as stated in the article’s PDF document. This license provides that the article published can be shared (allows you to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format) and adapted (allows you to remix, transform, and create from the material for any purpose, even commercial) by anyone.
After article acceptance, the authors must sign a Term of Authorization for Publication, which is sent to the authors by e-mail for electronic signature before publication.
References
Angrosino, M., & Pérez, K. (2000). Rethinking observation from method to context. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln, (Eds.). Handbook of qualitative research. (pp. 673-702). Sage.
Ansell, C. (2016). Pragmatism. In C. Ansell & J. Torfing, (Eds.), Handbook on theories of governance (pp. 392-400). Edward Elgar.
Ansell, C., & Torfing, J. (2016). Introduction. In C. Ansell & J. Torfing, (Eds.), Handbook on theories of governance (pp. 1-17). Edward Elgar.
Barreto, H. (2014). Gestão ambiental e territorial: Um panorama dos espaços territoriais especialmente protegidos no Brasil. In P. Little (Ed.), Os novos desafios da polÃtica ambiental brasileira (pp. 274-302). IEB.
Beck, U. (2010). Sociedade de risco. Resumo de uma outra modernidade. Ed. 34. Becker, H. (1993). Metodologia de pesquisa em ciências sociais. Hucitec.
Bernard, E., Penna, L., & Araújo, E. (2014). Downgrading, downsizing, degazettement, and reclassification of protected areas in Brazil. Conservation Biology, 28(4), 939–950. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12298
Bevir, M. (2011). Governança democrática: uma genealogia. Revista de Sociologia e PolÃtica, 19(39), 103-114. https://doi. org/10.1590/S0104-44782011000200008
Bursztyn, M., & Bursztyn, M. A. (2013). Fundamentos de polÃtica e gestão ambiental: Os caminhos do desenvolvimento sustentável. Garamond.
Câmara, J. (2013). Governança Ambiental no Brasil: Ecos do passado. Revista de Sociologia e PolÃtica, 21(46), 125-146. https://doi. org/10.1590/S0104-44782013000200008
Cavalcanti, C. (2004). Economia e Ecologia: Problemas da Governança Ambiental no Brasil. Revista Iberoamericana de EconomÃa Ecológica, 1, 1-10.
Cefaï, D. (2010). Un pragmatisme ethnographique. In D. Cefaï (Ed.), L’engagement ethnographique (p. 447-492). EHESS.
Cefaï, D. (2011). Como uma associação nasce para o público: VÃnculos locais e arenas públicas em torno da associação La Bellevilleuse, em Paris. In D. Cefaï, M. Mello, F. Mota, & F. Veiga (Eds.). Arenas públicas: Por uma etnografia da vida associativa. Ed. UFF.
Cefaï, D. (2013). ¿ Qué es la etnografia? Inscripciones, extensiones y recepciones del trabajo de campo. Persona y Sociedad, 27(3), 11-32. https://doi.org/10.53689/pys.v27i3.47
Cefaï, D. (2017). Públicos, problemas públicos, arenas públicas. Novos Estudos, 36(1), 187-213. https://doi.org/10.25091/ S0101-3300201700010009
Chateauraynaud, F. (2016). Pragmatique des transformations et sociologie des controverses. In Histoires pragmatiques (pp. 349-385). EHESS.
Chateauraynaud, F. (2017). A captura como experiência, investigações pragmáticas e teorias do poder. Revista Brasileira de Ciências Sociais, 32(97). https://doi. org/10.17666/329504/2017
Chateauraynaud, F. (2022). Des expériences ordinaires aux processus critiques non-linéaires. Pragmata, (5), 20-94.
Cook, N., Valkan, S., Mascia, M., & McGeoch, M. (2017). Quantifying the extent of protected area downgrading, downsizing and degazettement in Australia. Conservation Biology, 31(5), 1039-1052. https://doi.org/10.1111/ cobi.12904
Cozzolino, L. (2014). Governança na gestão de Unidades de Conservação: Democratização na esfera pública ou legitimação de poder? [tese de doutorado]. Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro.
Dodier, N., & Barbot, J. (2017). A força dos dispositivos. Revista Sociedade e Estado, 32(2), 487-518. https://periodicos. unb.br/index.php/sociedade/article/view/6290
Evans, J., & Thomas, C. (2024). Environmental governance. Routledge.
Forester, J. (2012). On the theory and practice of critical pragmatism: Deliberative practice and creative negotiations. Planning Theory, 12(1) 5–22. https:/doi. org/10.1177/1473095212448750
Forrest, J., Mascia, M., Pailler, S., Abidin, S., Araujo, M., Krithivasan, R., Riveros, J. (2015). Tropical deforestation and carbon emissions from protected area downgrading, downsizing, and degazettement (PADDD). Conservation Letters, 8(3), 153–161. https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12144
Graham, J., Amos, B., & Plupmtre, T. (2003). Governance principles for protected areas in the 21st century. UICN.
Houdart, S., & Thiery, O. (2011). Humains, non-humains. Comment repeupler les sciences sociales. La Découverte.
Jacobi, P., & Sinisgalli, P. (2012). Governança ambiental e economia verde. Ciência e Saúde Coletiva, 17(6),1469-1478. https:// doi.org/10.1590/S1413-81232012000600011
Jeronymo, C., Silva, E., Tanizaki-Fonseca, K. (2021). Boa governança e participação social: Uma leitura crÃtica das polÃticas públicas de Unidades de Conservação da Natureza do Brasil. RAEGA - O Espaço Geográfico em Análise, 50, 107 – 135.
Jessop, B. (1998). The rise of governance and the risks of failure: The case of economic development. Blackwell.
Kroner, R., Qin, S., Cook, C., Krithivasan, R., Pack, S., Bonilla, O., Cort-Kansinally, K., Coutinho, B., Feng, M., Garcia, M., He, Y., Kennedy, C., Lebreton, C., Ledezma, J., Lovejoy, T., Luther, D., Parmanand, Y., RuÃz-Agudelo, C., Yerena, E., ... Mascia, M. (2019). The uncertain future of protected lands and waters. Science, 364(6443), 881-886. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aau5525
Leff, H. (2006). Racionalidade Ambiental, a reapropriação social da natureza. Civilização Brasileira.
Lei nº 10.530, de 02 de maio de 2019. (2019). Dispõe sobre a criação da unidade de conservação monumento natural municipal da lagoa do Peri (Mona da Lagoa do Peri) https://leismunicipais.com.br/a/sc/f/florianopolis/ lei-ordinaria/2019/1053/10530/lei-ordinaria-n-10530-2019-dispoe-sobre-a-criacao-da-unidade-deconservacao-monumento-natural-municipal-da-lagoa-doperi-mona-da-lagoa-do-peri
Marinho, M. (2013). Territorialidade e governança em áreas protegidas: O caso da comunidade do Marujá, no Parque Estadual da Ilha do Cardoso (Cananeia, SP) [tese de doutorado]. Universidade de São Paulo.
Mascia, M., & Pailler, S. (2011). Protected area downgrading, downsizing, and degazettement (PADDD) and its conservation implications. Conservation Letters, 4, 9–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-263X.2010.00147.x Mascia, M., Pailler, S., Krithivasan, R., Roshchanka, V., Burns, D., Mlotha, Murray, D., Peng, N. (2014). Protected area downgrading, downsizing, and degazettement (PADDD) in Africa, Asia, and Latin America and the Caribbean, 1900–2010PAD. Biological Conservation, 169, 355–361. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2013.11.021
Maserumule, M. (2011). Good governance in the new partnership for Africa´s development (NEPAD): A public administration perspective. [tese de doutorado]. University of South Africa.
Matarazzo, G. (2017). Gestão de unidades de conservação ambiental: Perspectivas pragmáticas e organizacionais. [tese de doutorado]. Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina.
Matarazzo, G., & Serva, M. (2019). Ação pública ambiental: uma investigação etnográfica pragmatista dos dispositivos de uma Unidade de Conservação (UC) federal em um território. In R. Cantu, S. Leal, D. Corrêa, & L. Chartain, (Eds.), Sociologia, crÃtica e pragmatismo: diálogos entre França e Brasil (pp. 475-488).
Pontes. Moura, A. (2016) Aplicação dos instrumentos de PolÃtica Ambiental no Brasil: avanços e desafios. In A. Moura (Ed.), Governança ambiental no Brasil: instituições, atores e polÃticas públicas (pp. 111-147). IPEA. Nuttall, M., Olsson, E., Washington, H., Ung, V., Bunnefeld, N., Merriman, J., Griffin, O., Hobson, K., Diment, A., & Kroner, R. G. (2023). Protected area downgrading, downsizing, and degazettement in Cambodia: Enabling conditions and opportunities for intervention. Conservation Science and Practice, 5(4), e12912. https:// doi.org/10.1111/csp2.12912
Ogien, A. (2015). Pragmatism’s legacy to sociology respecified. European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy, 7(1), 77-97. https://doi.org/10.4000/ejpap.371
Pecqueur, B. (2006). A guinada territorial da economia global. Eisforia, 4, 81-103.
Peretz, H. (2004). Les méthodes en sociologie, l’observation. La Découverte.
Projeto de Lei, nº 208 (2018). Projeto de Lei do Senado n° 208, de 2018. https://www25.senado.leg.br/web/atividade/materias/-/materia/133065
Qin, S., Kroner, R., Cook, C., Tesfaw, A., Braybrook, A., Rodriguez, C., Poelking, & C., Mascia, M. (2019). Protected area downgrading, downsizing, and degazettement as a threat to iconic protected areas. Conservation Biology, 33(6). https:// doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13365
Quéré, L. (2009). Intérêts et limites de la théorie des régimes pragmatiques pour la sociologie de l’action. In M. Brevigliere, C. Lafaye, D. Trom (Eds.), Compétences critiques et sens de la justice (pp. 309-332). Economica. Quéré, L. (1997). La situation toujours négligée? Réseaux, 15(85), 163-192. https://doi.org/10.3406/reso.1997.3139
Rhodes, R. (1996). The New Governance: Governing without Government. Political Studies, 44(4), 652-667.
Rigaud, B. (2012). Public governance, in L. Côté and J.-F. Savard (Eds.), Dictionnaire encyclopédique de l’administration publique. ENAP-CA, www.dictionnaire.enap.ca
Serva, M. (2023). Análise pragmatista de organizações. Revista de Administração de Empresas, 63(1), 1-22. http://dx.doi. org/10.1590/S0034-759020230101
World Bank. (1992). Governance and development. World Bank.
World Wildlife Fund. (2019). PADDD trends in Brazilian Amazon protected areas-mapping the risk of protected area downgrade, downsize and degazettement in the biome. https://wwfbrnew.awsassets.panda.org/downloads/wwf_br_paddd_ amazontrends_summary.pdf