Technology Companies Analyzed Based on the Multidimensional Work Motivation Scale
Main Article Content
Abstract
This article aims to analyze the motivational factors, using the Self-Determination Theory (Deci & Ryan, 1985) and the application of the Multidimensional Work Motivation Scale (MWMS) (Gagné et al., 2014; Santos et al., in press) among workers in technology companies in Southern Brazil. The data collection included 256 respondents of the questionnaire and 06 semi-structured interviews, therefore being a quantitative-qualitative research with a descriptive nature. In the quantitative step, we applied the Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA), scale reliability analysis by Cronbach’s alpha coefficient and other statistical tests. The qualitative step was treated through content analysis. The main results indicate that these workers are primarily oriented by Autonomous Motivation, followed by Controlled Motivation. It should be noted that the Demotivation factor was not evidenced in the set of workers studied. We recommend that motivation be addressed jointly at the organizational, leadership and individual levels, covering more elements that can leverage worker well-being and consequently improve organizational results.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Download data is not yet available.
Article Details
How to Cite
Machado, C. L. da S., Cabral, P. M. F., & Vaccaro, G. L. R. (1). Technology Companies Analyzed Based on the Multidimensional Work Motivation Scale. Journal of Contemporary Administration, 22(3), 336-354. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-7849rac2018170135
Section
Articles
This journal remains the copyright holder of articles published. In order to be published, authors must sign the Transfer of Copyrights Document, which is sent to the authors by e-mail, thus granting rights, including on translation, to the Journal of Contemporary Administration. The journal grants third parties the right to use, reproduce, and share the article according to the Creative Commons license agreement (CC-BY 4.0), as stated in the article’s PDF documents.