Bioeconomy in Amazonia: Tensions and Synergies of Corporate Sustainability
Main Article Content
Abstract
Manioca is a successful food-tech company, an entrepreneurial initiative emerging from a desire to share the flavours of the Amazonia globally. The scarcity of typical Amazonian products in the Southeast region of Brazil, coupled with a general interest in Northern cuisine, led Joanna Martins to pursue her vision of commercializing local products. After an unsuccessful venture, her experience paved the way for success in her second business: the Manioca, a food industry based on local raw materials. The industry prioritizes sustainable sourcing and fair stakeholder relationships. Joanna and her co-founder, Paulo Reis, navigated numerous challenges but now face difficulties securing additional supply for the industry due to Amazonia’s limitations. She confronts the decision to either develop suppliers directly or outsource through intermediaries, each impacting the industry’s economic, social, and environmental dimensions differently. This case focuses on the concepts of triple bottom line and sustainability tensions and invites students to consider the factors influencing Joanna’s decision. This analysis is relevant to management, sustainability, operations, entrepreneurship, and agribusiness disciplines. It underscores the complexity of corporate sustainability, advocating for a systemic perspective beyond financial metrics and reevaluating current sustainability frameworks.
Download data is not yet available.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Since mid-February of 2023, the authors retain the copyright relating to their article and grant the journal RAC, from ANPAD, the right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (CC BY 4.0), as stated in the article’s PDF document. This license provides that the article published can be shared (allows you to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format) and adapted (allows you to remix, transform, and create from the material for any purpose, even commercial) by anyone.
After article acceptance, the authors must sign a Term of Authorization for Publication, which is sent to the authors by e-mail for electronic signature before publication.
References
Bansal, P. (2005). Evolving sustainably: A longitudinal study of corporate sustainable development. Strategic Management Journal, 26(3), 197-218. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.441
Bansal, P., & DesJardine, M. R. (2014). Business sustainability: It is about time. Strategic organization, 12(1), 70-78. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127013520265
Bansal, P., & Song, H. C. (2017). Similar but not the same: Differentiating corporate sustainability from corporate responsibility. Academy of Management Annals, 11(1), 105-149. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2015.0095
Bastos Lima, M. G., & Palme, U. (2022). The bioeconomy– biodiversity nexus: Enhancing or undermining nature’s contributions to people? Conservation, 2(1), 7-25. https://doi.org/10.3390/conservation2010002
Bugge, M. M., Hansen, T., & Klitkou, A. (2019). What is the bioeconomy? In A. Klitkou, A. M. Fevolden, & M. Capasso, From Waste to Value (pp. 19-50). Routledge.
Brundtland, G. H., Khalid, M., Agnelli, S., Al-Athel, S. A., Chidzero, B., Fadika, L. M., Hauff, V., Lang, I., Ma, S., Botero, M. M., & Singh, N. (1987). Our common future: Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development, A/42/427.
Carmine, S., & De Marchi, V. (2023). Reviewing paradox theory in corporate sustainability toward a systems perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 184, 139-158. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-022-05112-2
Elkington, J. (1998). Cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st century business. New Society Publishers.
Elkington, J. (2018). 25 years ago I coined the phrase “Triple Bottom Line.” Here’s why it’s time to rethink it. Harvard Business Review Digital Articles.
Hahn, T., Figge, F., Pinkse, J., & Preuss, L. (2010). Trade-offs in corporate sustainability: You can’t have your cake and eat it: Trade-Offs in corporate sustainability: You can’t have your cake and eat it. Business Strategy and the Environment, 19(4), 217-229. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.674
Hahn, T., Pinkse, J., Preuss, L., & Figge, F. (2015). Tensions in corporate sustainability: Towards an integrative framework. Journal of Business Ethics, 127(2), 297-316. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2047-5
Holmgren, S., D’Amato, D., & Giurca, A. (2020). Bioeconomy imaginaries: A review of forest-related social science literature. Ambio, 49(12), 1860-1877. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-020-01398-6
Nobre, C., Encalada, A., Anderson, E., Roca Alcazar, F. H., Bustamante, M., Mena, C., Peña-Claros, M., Poveda, G., Rodriguez, J. P., Saleska, S., Trumbore, S., Val, A. L., Villa Nova, L., Abramovay, R., Alencar, A., Alzza, A. C. R., Armenteras, D., Artaxo, P., Athayde, S., … Zapata-Ríos, G. (2021). Relatório de Avaliação da Amazônia 2021. https://www.aamazoniaquequeremos.org/
Poole, M. S., & Van de Ven, A. H. (1989). Using paradox to build management and organization theories. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 562-578. https://doi.org/10.2307/258559
Van der Byl, C. A., & Slawinski, N. (2015). Embracing tensions in corporate sustainability: A review of research from win-wins and trade-offs to paradoxes and beyond. Organization and Environment, 28(1), 54-79. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26164722
Vivien, F. D., Nieddu, M., Befort, N., Debref, R., & Giampietro, M. (2019). The hijacking of the bioeconomy. Ecological Economics, 159(June 2018), 189-197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.01.027